{
  "id": 11987077,
  "name": "Trustees of the University vs. Foy",
  "name_abbreviation": "Trustees of the University v. Foy",
  "decision_date": "1805-12",
  "docket_number": "",
  "first_page": "374",
  "last_page": "375",
  "citations": [
    {
      "type": "nominative",
      "cite": "2 Hayw. 374"
    },
    {
      "type": "official",
      "cite": "3 N.C. 374"
    }
  ],
  "court": {
    "name_abbreviation": "N.C. Super. Ct.",
    "id": 22358,
    "name": "North Carolina Superior Court"
  },
  "jurisdiction": {
    "id": 5,
    "name_long": "North Carolina",
    "name": "N.C."
  },
  "cites_to": [],
  "analysis": {
    "cardinality": 117,
    "char_count": 1143,
    "ocr_confidence": 0.304,
    "sha256": "67e80568caf345d8ddd7fbdf3aa78d2d2b5223f6a4e2b6be8cdcd6a6eb8fd4ec",
    "simhash": "1:88a979a04cdc6dd6",
    "word_count": 201
  },
  "last_updated": "2023-07-14T20:25:52.833864+00:00",
  "provenance": {
    "date_added": "2019-08-29",
    "source": "Harvard",
    "batch": "2018"
  },
  "casebody": {
    "judges": [],
    "parties": [
      "Trustees of the University vs. Foy."
    ],
    "opinions": [
      {
        "text": "Macar/, Judge.\nI am of the same opinion\u00bb",
        "type": "majority",
        "author": "Macar/, Judge."
      },
      {
        "text": "Hail, Judge.\nIt concur ';/\u00ab;!? ray brethren, that the Assembly Itave iao power to take away tas property of sa individual or <si a common corporation. But as the University is a public 1 think,, Lte all other public mate etc- it is subject rt the eontroul sf the I-egiclaiure ; arid that the Assembly may ?.r~ sign more or less funds for its support at differed times, as they Eiay judge best for the public interest. E am of opinion, therefore* that the repealing act is not unconstitutional1*",
        "type": "concurrence",
        "author": "Hail, Judge."
      }
    ],
    "attorneys": [],
    "corrections": "",
    "head_matter": "Trustees of the University vs. Foy.\nnpHE court nov/ gave their opinions in this cause. Locked Judge. \u2014 The Assembly cannot by passing an act of Assembly take away property frern a private person, nor a common corporation, much less i'rorp the trustees of the University; that being established by the constitution itself, or what is the same thing, in pursuance of a direction in the constitution. I am therefore of opinion, that the repealing act, 1800, cb. 5, the object of which is to resume the escheated property g \"anted to the trustees by the former acts, is repugnant to the constitution, and void."
  },
  "file_name": "0374-03",
  "first_page_order": 378,
  "last_page_order": 379
}