{
  "id": 11987315,
  "name": "Howard vs. Person's administrators",
  "name_abbreviation": "Howard v. Person's administrators",
  "decision_date": "1805-12",
  "docket_number": "",
  "first_page": "376",
  "last_page": "377",
  "citations": [
    {
      "type": "nominative",
      "cite": "2 Hayw. 376"
    },
    {
      "type": "official",
      "cite": "3 N.C. 376"
    }
  ],
  "court": {
    "name_abbreviation": "N.C. Super. Ct.",
    "id": 22358,
    "name": "North Carolina Superior Court"
  },
  "jurisdiction": {
    "id": 5,
    "name_long": "North Carolina",
    "name": "N.C."
  },
  "cites_to": [],
  "analysis": {
    "cardinality": 63,
    "char_count": 640,
    "ocr_confidence": 0.259,
    "sha256": "172a53dd03ceedf6499b0bb13ed9321b9d642b52014aaddfa6418da6cd7b8195",
    "simhash": "1:531b4486335dece4",
    "word_count": 123
  },
  "last_updated": "2023-07-14T20:25:52.833864+00:00",
  "provenance": {
    "date_added": "2019-08-29",
    "source": "Harvard",
    "batch": "2018"
  },
  "casebody": {
    "judges": [],
    "parties": [
      "Howard vs. Person's administrators."
    ],
    "opinions": [
      {
        "text": "A NEW trial had been moved for in Halifax Superior Court, but the motion and rule to shew cause, had not been entered of record by che clerk ; and the Judge had mentioned to the counsel for the defendant, to cau>e an entry to be made by the cieick, who was absent of the removal of the cause to the Court of Conference j all which had been neglected. And now the Court of Conference determined that the entry of the rule to shew cause why there should not be a new trial, should be entered by the clerk, nunc pro tunc; and that the nest court should determine whether there should be a new trial or not*",
        "type": "majority",
        "author": null
      }
    ],
    "attorneys": [],
    "corrections": "",
    "head_matter": "Howard vs. Person's administrators."
  },
  "file_name": "0376-01",
  "first_page_order": 380,
  "last_page_order": 381
}