{
  "id": 8560524,
  "name": "PIERCE v. PIVER",
  "name_abbreviation": "Pierce v. Piver",
  "decision_date": "1980-05-06",
  "docket_number": "No. 88 PC; No. 19 (Fall Term)",
  "first_page": "198",
  "last_page": "198",
  "citations": [
    {
      "type": "official",
      "cite": "300 N.C. 198"
    }
  ],
  "court": {
    "name_abbreviation": "N.C.",
    "id": 9292,
    "name": "Supreme Court of North Carolina"
  },
  "jurisdiction": {
    "id": 5,
    "name_long": "North Carolina",
    "name": "N.C."
  },
  "cites_to": [
    {
      "cite": "45 N.C. App. 111",
      "category": "reporters:state",
      "reporter": "N.C. App.",
      "case_ids": [
        8547697
      ],
      "opinion_index": -1,
      "case_paths": [
        "/nc-app/45/0111-01"
      ]
    }
  ],
  "analysis": {
    "cardinality": 39,
    "char_count": 267,
    "ocr_confidence": 0.838,
    "pagerank": {
      "raw": 4.03580807328026e-08,
      "percentile": 0.20615506927237842
    },
    "sha256": "69516e83abd868436e519cb743be50576c3c0c766ab3eb41856f63502cbbe796",
    "simhash": "1:0a3b9466ed3ed918",
    "word_count": 45
  },
  "last_updated": "2023-07-14T20:04:36.297481+00:00",
  "provenance": {
    "date_added": "2019-08-29",
    "source": "Harvard",
    "batch": "2018"
  },
  "casebody": {
    "judges": [],
    "parties": [
      "PIERCE v. PIVER"
    ],
    "opinions": [
      {
        "text": "Petition by defendant for discretionary review under G.S. 7A-31 allowed 6 May 1980. Motion of plaintiffs to dismiss appeal for lack of substantial constitutional question denied 6 May 1980.",
        "type": "majority",
        "author": null
      }
    ],
    "attorneys": [],
    "corrections": "",
    "head_matter": "PIERCE v. PIVER\nNo. 88 PC.\nNo. 19 (Fall Term).\nCase below: 45 N.C. App. 111."
  },
  "file_name": "0198-05",
  "first_page_order": 230,
  "last_page_order": 230
}