{
  "id": 8568963,
  "name": "STATE v. CONARD",
  "name_abbreviation": "State v. Conard",
  "decision_date": "1982-03-03",
  "docket_number": "No. 11 P 82",
  "first_page": "303",
  "last_page": "303",
  "citations": [
    {
      "type": "official",
      "cite": "305 N.C. 303"
    }
  ],
  "court": {
    "name_abbreviation": "N.C.",
    "id": 9292,
    "name": "Supreme Court of North Carolina"
  },
  "jurisdiction": {
    "id": 5,
    "name_long": "North Carolina",
    "name": "N.C."
  },
  "cites_to": [
    {
      "cite": "55 N.C. App. 63",
      "category": "reporters:state",
      "reporter": "N.C. App.",
      "case_ids": [
        8526699
      ],
      "opinion_index": -1,
      "case_paths": [
        "/nc-app/55/0063-01"
      ]
    },
    {
      "cite": "11 P 82",
      "category": "reporters:state_regional",
      "reporter": "P.",
      "opinion_index": -1
    }
  ],
  "analysis": {
    "cardinality": 38,
    "char_count": 258,
    "ocr_confidence": 0.794,
    "pagerank": {
      "raw": 4.03580807328026e-08,
      "percentile": 0.20649041700886808
    },
    "sha256": "029359a3966592ce5dcac9d5f9bfb3666ba3f919d86d1952a191f7b9f93197c6",
    "simhash": "1:8a3403635a3e7185",
    "word_count": 43
  },
  "last_updated": "2023-07-14T14:52:50.465071+00:00",
  "provenance": {
    "date_added": "2019-08-29",
    "source": "Harvard",
    "batch": "2018"
  },
  "casebody": {
    "judges": [],
    "parties": [
      "STATE v. CONARD"
    ],
    "opinions": [
      {
        "text": "Petition by defendant for discretionary review under G.S. 7A-31 denied 3 March 1982. Motion of Attorney General to dismiss appeal for lack of substantial constitutional question allowed 3 March 1982.",
        "type": "majority",
        "author": null
      }
    ],
    "attorneys": [],
    "corrections": "",
    "head_matter": "STATE v. CONARD\nNo. 11 P 82.\nCase below: 55 N.C. App. 63."
  },
  "file_name": "0303-05",
  "first_page_order": 335,
  "last_page_order": 335
}
