{
  "id": 8568811,
  "name": "STATE OF NORTH CAROLINA v. DUDLEY G. McGRAW",
  "name_abbreviation": "State v. McGraw",
  "decision_date": "1982-07-13",
  "docket_number": "No. 44PA82",
  "first_page": "372",
  "last_page": "373",
  "citations": [
    {
      "type": "official",
      "cite": "306 N.C. 372"
    }
  ],
  "court": {
    "name_abbreviation": "N.C.",
    "id": 9292,
    "name": "Supreme Court of North Carolina"
  },
  "jurisdiction": {
    "id": 5,
    "name_long": "North Carolina",
    "name": "N.C."
  },
  "cites_to": [
    {
      "cite": "261 S.E. 2d 114",
      "category": "reporters:state_regional",
      "reporter": "S.E.2d",
      "year": 1980,
      "opinion_index": 0
    },
    {
      "cite": "299 N.C. 95",
      "category": "reporters:state",
      "reporter": "N.C.",
      "case_ids": [
        8573434
      ],
      "year": 1980,
      "opinion_index": 0,
      "case_paths": [
        "/nc/299/0095-01"
      ]
    }
  ],
  "analysis": {
    "cardinality": 98,
    "char_count": 934,
    "ocr_confidence": 0.777,
    "pagerank": {
      "raw": 4.03580807328026e-08,
      "percentile": 0.20648346679671287
    },
    "sha256": "df0523d75f7c2511aa1958717c5e2342342d449fec201927009a8c9da8135659",
    "simhash": "1:833bd4f1c6e78d2b",
    "word_count": 150
  },
  "last_updated": "2023-07-14T20:30:26.892112+00:00",
  "provenance": {
    "date_added": "2019-08-29",
    "source": "Harvard",
    "batch": "2018"
  },
  "casebody": {
    "judges": [],
    "parties": [
      "STATE OF NORTH CAROLINA v. DUDLEY G. McGRAW"
    ],
    "opinions": [
      {
        "text": "PER CURIAM.\nWe conclude that our order granting discretionary review was improvidently allowed. However, for the correct statement of the rules for appellate review of a trial court\u2019s ruling on a motion to dismiss for evidentiary insufficiency, see State v. Powell, 299 N.C. 95, 261 S.E. 2d 114 (1980).",
        "type": "majority",
        "author": "PER CURIAM."
      }
    ],
    "attorneys": [
      "Rufus L. Edmisten, Attorney General by David Roy Blackwell for the State.",
      "Wayne Eads, Attorney for Defendant-Appellee."
    ],
    "corrections": "",
    "head_matter": "STATE OF NORTH CAROLINA v. DUDLEY G. McGRAW\nNo. 44PA82\n(Filed 13 July 1982)\nOn review upon the State\u2019s petition for discretionary review filed pursuant to G.S. \u00a7 7A-31. Defendant was convicted of felonious manufacture of marijuana and was sentenced to a term of five years. The Court of Appeals reversed defendant\u2019s conviction in an opinion reported pursuant to Rule 30(e) of the North Carolina Rules of Appellate Procedure. We allowed the State\u2019s petition for discretionary review by order dated 30 March 1982.\nRufus L. Edmisten, Attorney General by David Roy Blackwell for the State.\nWayne Eads, Attorney for Defendant-Appellee."
  },
  "file_name": "0372-01",
  "first_page_order": 400,
  "last_page_order": 401
}