{
  "id": 8573797,
  "name": "BARBARA PAGE v. WILLIAM WENTING TAO",
  "name_abbreviation": "Page v. Tao",
  "decision_date": "1982-10-05",
  "docket_number": "No. 255A82",
  "first_page": "739",
  "last_page": "739",
  "citations": [
    {
      "type": "official",
      "cite": "306 N.C. 739"
    }
  ],
  "court": {
    "name_abbreviation": "N.C.",
    "id": 9292,
    "name": "Supreme Court of North Carolina"
  },
  "jurisdiction": {
    "id": 5,
    "name_long": "North Carolina",
    "name": "N.C."
  },
  "cites_to": [
    {
      "cite": "289 S.E. 2d 910",
      "category": "reporters:state_regional",
      "reporter": "S.E.2d",
      "year": 1982,
      "opinion_index": -1
    },
    {
      "cite": "56 N.C. App. 488",
      "category": "reporters:state",
      "reporter": "N.C. App.",
      "case_ids": [
        8522181
      ],
      "year": 1982,
      "opinion_index": -1,
      "case_paths": [
        "/nc-app/56/0488-01"
      ]
    }
  ],
  "analysis": {
    "cardinality": 104,
    "char_count": 1027,
    "ocr_confidence": 0.774,
    "pagerank": {
      "raw": 5.4033266686372354e-08,
      "percentile": 0.3406370410012321
    },
    "sha256": "658328ab0477a60b6521e0a51f7c7fac014977843b08b69d057988e35fccd82a",
    "simhash": "1:180834bde603896b",
    "word_count": 171
  },
  "last_updated": "2023-07-14T20:30:26.892112+00:00",
  "provenance": {
    "date_added": "2019-08-29",
    "source": "Harvard",
    "batch": "2018"
  },
  "casebody": {
    "judges": [],
    "parties": [
      "BARBARA PAGE v. WILLIAM WENTING TAO"
    ],
    "opinions": [
      {
        "text": "PER CURIAM.\nThe facts are fully and accurately stated in the opinion of the Court of Appeals. For the reasons given in that opinion, the decision of the Court of Appeals is\nAffirmed.",
        "type": "majority",
        "author": "PER CURIAM."
      }
    ],
    "attorneys": [
      "Coleman, Bernholz, Dickerson, Bernholz, Gledhill & Hargrave, by Alonzo B. Coleman, Jr. and Douglas Hargrave, for plaintiff appellee.",
      "Newsome, Graham, Hedrick, Murray, Bryson & Kennon, by E. C. Bryson, Jr. and Lewis A. Cheek, for defendant appellant."
    ],
    "corrections": "",
    "head_matter": "BARBARA PAGE v. WILLIAM WENTING TAO\nNo. 255A82\n(Filed 5 October 1982)\nAPPEAL as of right pursuant to G.S. 7A-30(2) from a decision of a divided panel of the Court of Appeals which reversed the trial court\u2019s order granting the defendant\u2019s motion for judgment notwithstanding the verdict and remanding the case for entry of judgment on the jury verdict for the plaintiff and against the defendant. The opinion of the Court of Appeals, reported at 56 N.C. App. 488, 289 S.E. 2d 910 (1982), is by Judge Becton with Judge Hill concurring and Judge Hedrick concurring in part and dissenting in part.\nColeman, Bernholz, Dickerson, Bernholz, Gledhill & Hargrave, by Alonzo B. Coleman, Jr. and Douglas Hargrave, for plaintiff appellee.\nNewsome, Graham, Hedrick, Murray, Bryson & Kennon, by E. C. Bryson, Jr. and Lewis A. Cheek, for defendant appellant."
  },
  "file_name": "0739-01",
  "first_page_order": 767,
  "last_page_order": 767
}