{
  "id": 8560847,
  "name": "STATE OF NORTH CAROLINA v. JOSEPH EMANUEL THOMPSON",
  "name_abbreviation": "State v. Thompson",
  "decision_date": "1982-11-03",
  "docket_number": "No. 329A82",
  "first_page": "125",
  "last_page": "125",
  "citations": [
    {
      "type": "official",
      "cite": "307 N.C. 125"
    }
  ],
  "court": {
    "name_abbreviation": "N.C.",
    "id": 9292,
    "name": "Supreme Court of North Carolina"
  },
  "jurisdiction": {
    "id": 5,
    "name_long": "North Carolina",
    "name": "N.C."
  },
  "cites_to": [
    {
      "cite": "291 S.E. 2d 266",
      "category": "reporters:state_regional",
      "reporter": "S.E.2d",
      "year": 1982,
      "opinion_index": -1
    },
    {
      "cite": "57 N.C. App. 142",
      "category": "reporters:state",
      "reporter": "N.C. App.",
      "case_ids": [
        8522602
      ],
      "year": 1982,
      "opinion_index": -1,
      "case_paths": [
        "/nc-app/57/0142-01"
      ]
    }
  ],
  "analysis": {
    "cardinality": 102,
    "char_count": 1011,
    "ocr_confidence": 0.778,
    "pagerank": {
      "raw": 4.03580807328026e-08,
      "percentile": 0.20616684602075255
    },
    "sha256": "5ec5e8e721c0387f8f664afe06ea0350289901751255010c61bf41336aeff664",
    "simhash": "1:0d1652b2365544bd",
    "word_count": 167
  },
  "last_updated": "2023-07-14T20:07:32.557624+00:00",
  "provenance": {
    "date_added": "2019-08-29",
    "source": "Harvard",
    "batch": "2018"
  },
  "casebody": {
    "judges": [],
    "parties": [
      "STATE OF NORTH CAROLINA v. JOSEPH EMANUEL THOMPSON"
    ],
    "opinions": [
      {
        "text": "PER CURIAM.\nThe majority of the panel of the Court of Appeals which decided this case correctly concluded that the trial court expressed an opinion on the evidence and thereby violated G.S. 15A-1232. Consequently, the majority opinion of the Court of Appeals awarding the defendant a new trial must be affirmed. It is unnecessary for this Court to consider the other matters discussed in the majority opinion in the Court of Appeals, as they are not likely to arise again during a retrial of this case.\nAffirmed.",
        "type": "majority",
        "author": "PER CURIAM."
      }
    ],
    "attorneys": [
      "Rufus L. Edmisten, Attorney General, by William R. Shenton and Robert L. Hillman, Assistant Attorneys General, for the State.",
      "Adam Stein, Appellate Defender, by Ann B. Petersen, Assistant Appellate Defender, for defendant-appellee."
    ],
    "corrections": "",
    "head_matter": "STATE OF NORTH CAROLINA v. JOSEPH EMANUEL THOMPSON\nNo. 329A82\n(Filed 3 November 1982)\nAppeal of right pursuant to G.S. 7A-30\u00cd2) from a decision of a divided panel of the Court of Appeals, 57 N.C. App. 142, 291 S.E. 2d 266 (1982), awarding the defendant a new trial.\nRufus L. Edmisten, Attorney General, by William R. Shenton and Robert L. Hillman, Assistant Attorneys General, for the State.\nAdam Stein, Appellate Defender, by Ann B. Petersen, Assistant Appellate Defender, for defendant-appellee."
  },
  "file_name": "0125-01",
  "first_page_order": 153,
  "last_page_order": 153
}