{
  "id": 8563198,
  "name": "STATE v. DANCY & MOORE",
  "name_abbreviation": "State v. Dancy",
  "decision_date": "1983-01-11",
  "docket_number": "No. 667P82",
  "first_page": "470",
  "last_page": "470",
  "citations": [
    {
      "type": "official",
      "cite": "307 N.C. 470"
    }
  ],
  "court": {
    "name_abbreviation": "N.C.",
    "id": 9292,
    "name": "Supreme Court of North Carolina"
  },
  "jurisdiction": {
    "id": 5,
    "name_long": "North Carolina",
    "name": "N.C."
  },
  "cites_to": [
    {
      "cite": "59 N.C. App. 362",
      "category": "reporters:state",
      "reporter": "N.C. App.",
      "opinion_index": -1
    }
  ],
  "analysis": {
    "cardinality": 37,
    "char_count": 272,
    "ocr_confidence": 0.73,
    "sha256": "d16cbde749884a2461e9899b34e706fcab99595216028a5a254a45f98f3e145e",
    "simhash": "1:13aa0943d27e791e",
    "word_count": 42
  },
  "last_updated": "2023-07-14T20:07:32.557624+00:00",
  "provenance": {
    "date_added": "2019-08-29",
    "source": "Harvard",
    "batch": "2018"
  },
  "casebody": {
    "judges": [],
    "parties": [
      "STATE v. DANCY & MOORE"
    ],
    "opinions": [
      {
        "text": "Petition by defendants for discretionary review under G.S. 7A-31 denied 11 January 1983. Motion of Attorney General to dismiss appeal for lack of substantial constitutional question allowed 11 January 1983.",
        "type": "majority",
        "author": null
      }
    ],
    "attorneys": [],
    "corrections": "",
    "head_matter": "STATE v. DANCY & MOORE\nNo. 667P82.\nCase below: 59 N.C. App. 362."
  },
  "file_name": "0470-01",
  "first_page_order": 498,
  "last_page_order": 498
}