{
  "id": 4766244,
  "name": "JUANITA NASH v. CONRAD INDUSTRIES, INC. and IOWA NATIONAL MUTUAL INSURANCE COMPANY",
  "name_abbreviation": "Nash v. Conrad Industries, Inc.",
  "decision_date": "1983-11-03",
  "docket_number": "No. 379A83",
  "first_page": "629",
  "last_page": "629",
  "citations": [
    {
      "type": "official",
      "cite": "309 N.C. 629"
    }
  ],
  "court": {
    "name_abbreviation": "N.C.",
    "id": 9292,
    "name": "Supreme Court of North Carolina"
  },
  "jurisdiction": {
    "id": 5,
    "name_long": "North Carolina",
    "name": "N.C."
  },
  "cites_to": [
    {
      "cite": "62 N.C. App. 612",
      "category": "reporters:state",
      "reporter": "N.C. App.",
      "case_ids": [
        8524325
      ],
      "year": 1983,
      "opinion_index": -1,
      "case_paths": [
        "/nc-app/62/0612-01"
      ]
    }
  ],
  "analysis": {
    "cardinality": 158,
    "char_count": 1827,
    "ocr_confidence": 0.836,
    "pagerank": {
      "raw": 1.567925211374822e-07,
      "percentile": 0.678167530230527
    },
    "sha256": "7576c52ea144613238f30cef760025e9a9a9f00ac8412de371ced43834fb52d2",
    "simhash": "1:29d5649954e3ea97",
    "word_count": 292
  },
  "last_updated": "2023-07-14T18:05:00.577130+00:00",
  "provenance": {
    "date_added": "2019-08-29",
    "source": "Harvard",
    "batch": "2018"
  },
  "casebody": {
    "judges": [],
    "parties": [
      "JUANITA NASH v. CONRAD INDUSTRIES, INC. and IOWA NATIONAL MUTUAL INSURANCE COMPANY"
    ],
    "opinions": [
      {
        "text": "PER CURIAM.\nThe facts of this case are set out at length in the opinion of the Court of Appeals. The majority of the panel of the Court of Appeals reversed and remanded the Industrial Commission\u2019s Opinion and Award for further findings relating to whether the plaintiff was totally disabled for any employment between 8 June 1980 and 1 October 1981. We agree with the majority opinion. The Court of Appeals unanimously affirmed the Industrial Commission\u2019s Award with respect to plaintiffs permanent partial disability to her back and knees. We note that there is no indication in the record that the aggravation of the plaintiffs knee injury, which eventually led to permanent partial disability of plaintiffs knees, occurred prior to the initial hearing before the Hearing Commissioner. Nevertheless, as the Court of Appeals held, the Full Commission has the authority, pursuant to G.S. \u00a7 97-85, to reconsider evidence, take additional evidence, rehear the parties and, if appropriate, amend the award. Thus, it was proper for the Industrial Commission, in review of the Hearing Commissioner\u2019s Opinion and Award, to consider evidence relating to the disability of plaintiffs knees.\nThe decision of the Court of Appeals is affirmed.\nAffirmed.",
        "type": "majority",
        "author": "PER CURIAM."
      }
    ],
    "attorneys": [
      "Snyder, Leonard, Biggers & Dodd, P.A., by Gary A. Dodd, for the plaintiff-appellee.",
      "Van Winkle, Buck, Wall, Starnes & Davis, P.A., by Roy W. Davis, Jr. and Allan R. Tarleton, for defendant-appellant."
    ],
    "corrections": "",
    "head_matter": "JUANITA NASH v. CONRAD INDUSTRIES, INC. and IOWA NATIONAL MUTUAL INSURANCE COMPANY\nNo. 379A83\n(Filed 3 November 1983)\nDefendants appeal as a matter of right pursuant to G.S. \u00a7 7A-30(2) from the decision of the Court of Appeals, 62 N.C. App. 612, \u2014 S.E. 2d \u2014 (1983), one judge dissenting, which affirmed in part and reversed in part the Opinion and Award of the Industrial Commission.\nSnyder, Leonard, Biggers & Dodd, P.A., by Gary A. Dodd, for the plaintiff-appellee.\nVan Winkle, Buck, Wall, Starnes & Davis, P.A., by Roy W. Davis, Jr. and Allan R. Tarleton, for defendant-appellant."
  },
  "file_name": "0629-01",
  "first_page_order": 657,
  "last_page_order": 657
}