{
  "id": 2399754,
  "name": "STATE v. LOCKLEAR",
  "name_abbreviation": "State v. Locklear",
  "decision_date": "1984-03-06",
  "docket_number": "No. 18P84",
  "first_page": "479",
  "last_page": "479",
  "citations": [
    {
      "type": "official",
      "cite": "310 N.C. 479"
    }
  ],
  "court": {
    "name_abbreviation": "N.C.",
    "id": 9292,
    "name": "Supreme Court of North Carolina"
  },
  "jurisdiction": {
    "id": 5,
    "name_long": "North Carolina",
    "name": "N.C."
  },
  "cites_to": [
    {
      "cite": "65 N.C. App. 624",
      "category": "reporters:state",
      "reporter": "N.C. App.",
      "opinion_index": -1
    }
  ],
  "analysis": {
    "cardinality": 36,
    "char_count": 259,
    "ocr_confidence": 0.855,
    "sha256": "bb211ddcc01d13e82b66f8c32654400e2b55b6f7e5d4e1f1f5a321e7308c4baf",
    "simhash": "1:29fb107b5a40b018",
    "word_count": 41
  },
  "last_updated": "2023-07-14T22:57:26.657763+00:00",
  "provenance": {
    "date_added": "2019-08-29",
    "source": "Harvard",
    "batch": "2018"
  },
  "casebody": {
    "judges": [],
    "parties": [
      "STATE v. LOCKLEAR"
    ],
    "opinions": [
      {
        "text": "Petition by defendant for discretionary review under G.S. 7A-31 denied 6 March 1984. Motion by Attorney General to dismiss appeal for lack of substantial constitutional question allowed 6 March 1984.",
        "type": "majority",
        "author": null
      }
    ],
    "attorneys": [],
    "corrections": "",
    "head_matter": "STATE v. LOCKLEAR\nNo. 18P84.\nCase below: 65 N.C. App. 624."
  },
  "file_name": "0479-04",
  "first_page_order": 515,
  "last_page_order": 515
}