{
  "id": 2395644,
  "name": "CHRISTINE O'NEAL, Formerly Christine O'Neal Wynn v. JON B. WYNN",
  "name_abbreviation": "O'Neal v. Wynn",
  "decision_date": "1984-04-03",
  "docket_number": "No. 505A83",
  "first_page": "621",
  "last_page": "622",
  "citations": [
    {
      "type": "official",
      "cite": "310 N.C. 621"
    }
  ],
  "court": {
    "name_abbreviation": "N.C.",
    "id": 9292,
    "name": "Supreme Court of North Carolina"
  },
  "jurisdiction": {
    "id": 5,
    "name_long": "North Carolina",
    "name": "N.C."
  },
  "cites_to": [
    {
      "cite": "306 S.E. 2d 822",
      "category": "reporters:state_regional",
      "reporter": "S.E.2d",
      "year": 1983,
      "opinion_index": -1
    },
    {
      "cite": "64 N.C. App. 149",
      "category": "reporters:state",
      "reporter": "N.C. App.",
      "case_ids": [
        8526364
      ],
      "year": 1983,
      "opinion_index": -1,
      "case_paths": [
        "/nc-app/64/0149-01"
      ]
    }
  ],
  "analysis": {
    "cardinality": 116,
    "char_count": 1201,
    "ocr_confidence": 0.8,
    "pagerank": {
      "raw": 2.378428463079127e-07,
      "percentile": 0.796571923691304
    },
    "sha256": "0c7966319ec3411d7a9fcfc4e77065ef43704b578bc7995a3ed3acbc803b487f",
    "simhash": "1:0619763b6e1b85ef",
    "word_count": 205
  },
  "last_updated": "2023-07-14T22:57:26.657763+00:00",
  "provenance": {
    "date_added": "2019-08-29",
    "source": "Harvard",
    "batch": "2018"
  },
  "casebody": {
    "judges": [],
    "parties": [
      "CHRISTINE O\u2019NEAL, Formerly Christine O\u2019Neal Wynn v. JON B. WYNN"
    ],
    "opinions": [
      {
        "text": "PER CURIAM.\nThe facts of this case are adequately stated in the majority opinion of the Court of Appeals. After a careful review of the briefs and oral arguments presented in this case, and the majority decision of the Court of Appeals, we have concluded that the rationale and supporting authorities cited in the majority decision constitute a correct statement of the law and a correct application of the law to the facts of this case. Therefore, we agree with the result reached by the majority in the Court of Appeals.\nThe decision of the Court of Appeals is\nAffirmed.",
        "type": "majority",
        "author": "PER CURIAM."
      }
    ],
    "attorneys": [
      "Davis & Davis, by George Thomas Davis, Jr., for plaintiff-appellant.",
      "Carter, Archie & Hassell, by Sid Hassell, Jr., for defendantappellee."
    ],
    "corrections": "",
    "head_matter": "CHRISTINE O\u2019NEAL, Formerly Christine O\u2019Neal Wynn v. JON B. WYNN\nNo. 505A83\n(Filed 3 April 1984)\nAPPEAL of right by the plaintiff, pursuant to G.S. \u00a7 7A-30(2), from a decision of a divided panel of the Court of Appeals, 64 N.C. App. 149, 306 S.E. 2d 822 (1983), which affirmed the judgment entered by the Honorable Hallett S. Ward, Judge Presiding, at a Special Civil Session of District Court, Hyde County. Judgment was entered on 13 May 1982. Heard in the Supreme Court 15 February 1984.\nDavis & Davis, by George Thomas Davis, Jr., for plaintiff-appellant.\nCarter, Archie & Hassell, by Sid Hassell, Jr., for defendantappellee."
  },
  "file_name": "0621-01",
  "first_page_order": 657,
  "last_page_order": 658
}