{
  "id": 2393760,
  "name": "STANLEY v. RETIREMENT AND HEALTH BENEFITS DIVISION",
  "name_abbreviation": "Stanley v. Retirement & Health Benefits Division",
  "decision_date": "1984-04-03",
  "docket_number": "No. 86P84",
  "first_page": "626",
  "last_page": "626",
  "citations": [
    {
      "type": "official",
      "cite": "310 N.C. 626"
    }
  ],
  "court": {
    "name_abbreviation": "N.C.",
    "id": 9292,
    "name": "Supreme Court of North Carolina"
  },
  "jurisdiction": {
    "id": 5,
    "name_long": "North Carolina",
    "name": "N.C."
  },
  "cites_to": [
    {
      "cite": "66 N.C. App. 122",
      "category": "reporters:state",
      "reporter": "N.C. App.",
      "case_ids": [
        8523257
      ],
      "opinion_index": -1,
      "case_paths": [
        "/nc-app/66/0122-01"
      ]
    }
  ],
  "analysis": {
    "cardinality": 39,
    "char_count": 285,
    "ocr_confidence": 0.773,
    "pagerank": {
      "raw": 4.03580807328026e-08,
      "percentile": 0.08054504335967078
    },
    "sha256": "bfce9e6cc15d0b8fde378fbf6a9bd2ae1510ee8a3b2cf37c84f80a0b91185082",
    "simhash": "1:9a321b6b5260b476",
    "word_count": 44
  },
  "last_updated": "2023-07-14T22:57:26.657763+00:00",
  "provenance": {
    "date_added": "2019-08-29",
    "source": "Harvard",
    "batch": "2018"
  },
  "casebody": {
    "judges": [],
    "parties": [
      "STANLEY v. RETIREMENT AND HEALTH BENEFITS DIVISION"
    ],
    "opinions": [
      {
        "text": "Petition by plaintiff for discretionary review under G.S. 7A-31 denied 3 April 1984. Motion by defendant to dismiss appeal for lack of substantial constitutional question allowed 3 April 1984.",
        "type": "majority",
        "author": null
      }
    ],
    "attorneys": [],
    "corrections": "",
    "head_matter": "STANLEY v. RETIREMENT AND HEALTH BENEFITS DIVISION\nNo. 86P84.\nCase below: 66 N.C. App. 122."
  },
  "file_name": "0626-04",
  "first_page_order": 662,
  "last_page_order": 662
}