{
  "id": 4681761,
  "name": "STATE OF NORTH CAROLINA v. WILLIE LEE O'NEAL",
  "name_abbreviation": "State v. O'Neal",
  "decision_date": "1984-08-28",
  "docket_number": "No. 171P84",
  "first_page": "747",
  "last_page": "748",
  "citations": [
    {
      "type": "official",
      "cite": "311 N.C. 747"
    }
  ],
  "court": {
    "name_abbreviation": "N.C.",
    "id": 9292,
    "name": "Supreme Court of North Carolina"
  },
  "jurisdiction": {
    "id": 5,
    "name_long": "North Carolina",
    "name": "N.C."
  },
  "cites_to": [],
  "analysis": {
    "cardinality": 104,
    "char_count": 1581,
    "ocr_confidence": 0.804,
    "pagerank": {
      "raw": 5.6084544579407814e-08,
      "percentile": 0.351226461465514
    },
    "sha256": "13ac954aa3377c815d020be655fc0f707792783d9e57a930b690bf58422348e0",
    "simhash": "1:38be9cf35aa5e4bd",
    "word_count": 266
  },
  "last_updated": "2023-07-14T21:17:48.934020+00:00",
  "provenance": {
    "date_added": "2019-08-29",
    "source": "Harvard",
    "batch": "2018"
  },
  "casebody": {
    "judges": [],
    "parties": [
      "STATE OF NORTH CAROLINA v. WILLIE LEE O\u2019NEAL"
    ],
    "opinions": [
      {
        "text": "ORDER\nUPON consideration of the Attorney General\u2019s notice of appeal from the North Carolina Court of Appeals, filed in this matter pursuant to G.S. 7A-30, and the Defendant\u2019s motion to dismiss the appeal for lack of substantial constitutional question and upon consideration of the Attorney General\u2019s petition for discretionary review of the decision of the North Carolina Court of Appeals, pursuant to G.S. 7A-31, the following order was entered and is hereby certified to the North Carolina Court of Appeals: Defendant\u2019s motion to dismiss the appeal is\n\u201cAllowed by order of the Court in conference, this the 28th day of August 1984.\u201d\nThe Attorney General\u2019s petition for discretionary review is allowed for the sole purpose of entering the following order:\n\u201cThe Court of Appeals held that defendant was entitled to a new trial at which defendant \u2018can at most be convicted of voluntary manslaughter.\u2019 The Court of Appeals then remanded the case to the trial court for a new trial limited to the issue of whether defendant used excessive force in the commission of the homicide.\nThe opinion of the Court of Appeals is modified to provide that defendant shall be entitled to a new trial on the question of his guilt or innocence of voluntary manslaughter. As modified, the decision of the Court of Appeals is affirmed and this cause is remanded to that court for proceedings not inconsistent with this Order.\nBy order of the Court in conference, this the 28th day of August 1984.\nFrye, J.\nFor the Court\u201d",
        "type": "majority",
        "author": "Frye, J."
      }
    ],
    "attorneys": [],
    "corrections": "",
    "head_matter": "STATE OF NORTH CAROLINA v. WILLIE LEE O\u2019NEAL\nNo. 171P84\n(Filed 28 August 1984)"
  },
  "file_name": "0747-01",
  "first_page_order": 791,
  "last_page_order": 792
}