{
  "id": 4755452,
  "name": "STATE OF NORTH CAROLINA v. PRINCESS OHEEDA DULA",
  "name_abbreviation": "State v. Dula",
  "decision_date": "1984-10-02",
  "docket_number": "No. 252A84",
  "first_page": "80",
  "last_page": "80",
  "citations": [
    {
      "type": "official",
      "cite": "312 N.C. 80"
    }
  ],
  "court": {
    "name_abbreviation": "N.C.",
    "id": 9292,
    "name": "Supreme Court of North Carolina"
  },
  "jurisdiction": {
    "id": 5,
    "name_long": "North Carolina",
    "name": "N.C."
  },
  "cites_to": [
    {
      "cite": "813 S.E. 2d 899",
      "category": "reporters:state_regional",
      "reporter": "S.E.2d",
      "year": 1984,
      "opinion_index": -1
    },
    {
      "cite": "67 N.C. App. 748",
      "category": "reporters:state",
      "reporter": "N.C. App.",
      "case_ids": [
        8527238
      ],
      "year": 1984,
      "opinion_index": -1,
      "case_paths": [
        "/nc-app/67/0748-01"
      ]
    }
  ],
  "analysis": {
    "cardinality": 107,
    "char_count": 937,
    "ocr_confidence": 0.789,
    "pagerank": {
      "raw": 1.0300345638677451e-07,
      "percentile": 0.5478300086221243
    },
    "sha256": "8a821e3ece8dbb28f682aad4931c444857bcc7c1f3c9f62da2b1ce4557e7d576",
    "simhash": "1:0b7cf08a46a6c52d",
    "word_count": 156
  },
  "last_updated": "2023-07-14T18:10:57.145273+00:00",
  "provenance": {
    "date_added": "2019-08-29",
    "source": "Harvard",
    "batch": "2018"
  },
  "casebody": {
    "judges": [],
    "parties": [
      "STATE OF NORTH CAROLINA v. PRINCESS OHEEDA DULA"
    ],
    "opinions": [
      {
        "text": "PER CURIAM.\nThe Court of Appeals correctly held that the trial court did not commit error when it required the defendant to make restitution for the loss and damage caused by the defendant \u201carising out of\u2019 the offense committed by her as provided by G.S. 15A-1343(d).\nThe decision of the Court of Appeals is\nAffirmed.",
        "type": "majority",
        "author": "PER CURIAM."
      }
    ],
    "attorneys": [
      "Rufus L. Edmisten, Attorney General, by Walter M. Smith, Assistant Attorney General, for the State-appellee.",
      "Whisnant, Simmons & Groome, by G. C. Simmons, III, for defendant-appe limit."
    ],
    "corrections": "",
    "head_matter": "STATE OF NORTH CAROLINA v. PRINCESS OHEEDA DULA\nNo. 252A84\n(Filed 2 October 1984)\nDefendant appeals as a matter of right pursuant to G.S. 7A-30(2) from a decision of a divided panel of the Court of Appeals, 67 N.C. App. 748, 813 S.E. 2d 899 (1984), affirming the judgment, entered by Griffin, J., at the 3 November 1982 Criminal Session of Superior Court, CALDWELL County, finding defendant guilty of felonious breaking or entering.\nRufus L. Edmisten, Attorney General, by Walter M. Smith, Assistant Attorney General, for the State-appellee.\nWhisnant, Simmons & Groome, by G. C. Simmons, III, for defendant-appe limit."
  },
  "file_name": "0080-01",
  "first_page_order": 110,
  "last_page_order": 110
}