{
  "id": 4748672,
  "name": "JAMES A. DEAN, Employee v. CONE MILLS CORPORATION, Employer, and LIBERTY MUTUAL INSURANCE COMPANY, Carrier",
  "name_abbreviation": "Dean v. Cone Mills Corp.",
  "decision_date": "1984-12-04",
  "docket_number": "No. 203A84",
  "first_page": "487",
  "last_page": "487",
  "citations": [
    {
      "type": "official",
      "cite": "312 N.C. 487"
    }
  ],
  "court": {
    "name_abbreviation": "N.C.",
    "id": 9292,
    "name": "Supreme Court of North Carolina"
  },
  "jurisdiction": {
    "id": 5,
    "name_long": "North Carolina",
    "name": "N.C."
  },
  "cites_to": [
    {
      "cite": "313 S.E. 2d 11",
      "category": "reporters:state_regional",
      "reporter": "S.E.2d",
      "year": 1984,
      "opinion_index": -1
    },
    {
      "cite": "67 N.C. App. 237",
      "category": "reporters:state",
      "reporter": "N.C. App.",
      "case_ids": [
        8526111
      ],
      "year": 1984,
      "opinion_index": -1,
      "case_paths": [
        "/nc-app/67/0237-01"
      ]
    },
    {
      "cite": "301 S.E. 2d 359",
      "category": "reporters:state_regional",
      "reporter": "S.E.2d",
      "year": 1983,
      "opinion_index": 0
    },
    {
      "cite": "308 N.C. 85",
      "category": "reporters:state",
      "reporter": "N.C.",
      "case_ids": [
        4707972
      ],
      "year": 1983,
      "opinion_index": 0,
      "case_paths": [
        "/nc/308/0085-01"
      ]
    }
  ],
  "analysis": {
    "cardinality": 93,
    "char_count": 882,
    "ocr_confidence": 0.78,
    "pagerank": {
      "raw": 7.910444093458357e-08,
      "percentile": 0.461204108810977
    },
    "sha256": "15825e06a73d2d158eca015ab473dea0cb11c212834452eb3b0e38fc1405ef1e",
    "simhash": "1:2b0938bf20890d29",
    "word_count": 139
  },
  "last_updated": "2023-07-14T18:10:57.145273+00:00",
  "provenance": {
    "date_added": "2019-08-29",
    "source": "Harvard",
    "batch": "2018"
  },
  "casebody": {
    "judges": [],
    "parties": [
      "JAMES A. DEAN, Employee v. CONE MILLS CORPORATION, Employer, and LIBERTY MUTUAL INSURANCE COMPANY, Carrier"
    ],
    "opinions": [
      {
        "text": "PER CURIAM.\nThe decisions of the Court of Appeals and the Industrial Commission are vacated and the case is remanded to the Court of Appeals for further remand to the Industrial Commission for reconsideration by the Commission in light of this Court\u2019s opinion in Rutledge v. Tultex Corporation, 308 N.C. 85, 301 S.E. 2d 359 (1983).\nVacated and remanded.",
        "type": "majority",
        "author": "PER CURIAM."
      }
    ],
    "attorneys": [
      "Hassell, Hudson and Lore, by Charles R. Hassell, Jr., for plaintiff appellant.",
      "Maupin, Taylor and Ellis, P.A., by David V. Brooks, for defendant appellees."
    ],
    "corrections": "",
    "head_matter": "JAMES A. DEAN, Employee v. CONE MILLS CORPORATION, Employer, and LIBERTY MUTUAL INSURANCE COMPANY, Carrier\nNo. 203A84\n(Filed 4 December 1984)\nAppeal pursuant to N.C.G.S. 7A-30(2) by plaintiff from the Court of Appeals\u2019 decision, 67 N.C. App. 237, 313 S.E. 2d 11 (1984), affirming the Industrial Commission\u2019s denial of workers\u2019 compensation benefits, one judge dissenting.\nHassell, Hudson and Lore, by Charles R. Hassell, Jr., for plaintiff appellant.\nMaupin, Taylor and Ellis, P.A., by David V. Brooks, for defendant appellees."
  },
  "file_name": "0487-01",
  "first_page_order": 517,
  "last_page_order": 517
}