{
  "id": 4754414,
  "name": "STATE OF NORTH CAROLINA v. WINSTON FRED WILLIAMS",
  "name_abbreviation": "State v. Williams",
  "decision_date": "1985-01-08",
  "docket_number": "No. 113PA84",
  "first_page": "617",
  "last_page": "618",
  "citations": [
    {
      "type": "official",
      "cite": "312 N.C. 617"
    }
  ],
  "court": {
    "name_abbreviation": "N.C.",
    "id": 9292,
    "name": "Supreme Court of North Carolina"
  },
  "jurisdiction": {
    "id": 5,
    "name_long": "North Carolina",
    "name": "N.C."
  },
  "cites_to": [
    {
      "cite": "28 U.S.C. \u00a7 2254",
      "category": "laws:leg_statute",
      "reporter": "U.S.C.",
      "opinion_index": -1
    },
    {
      "cite": "265 S.E. 2d 215",
      "category": "reporters:state_regional",
      "reporter": "S.E.2d",
      "year": 1980,
      "opinion_index": -1
    },
    {
      "cite": "300 N.C. 190",
      "category": "reporters:state",
      "reporter": "N.C.",
      "case_ids": [
        8560070
      ],
      "year": 1980,
      "opinion_index": -1,
      "case_paths": [
        "/nc/300/0190-01"
      ]
    }
  ],
  "analysis": {
    "cardinality": 172,
    "char_count": 1962,
    "ocr_confidence": 0.858,
    "pagerank": {
      "raw": 4.03580807328026e-08,
      "percentile": 0.15334002098191826
    },
    "sha256": "d47e21c13059aa5f1655f4dbc3ba11417e7aed0205d2fc94a25b175c7ecf22b1",
    "simhash": "1:a12760a86e22c39f",
    "word_count": 315
  },
  "last_updated": "2023-07-14T18:10:57.145273+00:00",
  "provenance": {
    "date_added": "2019-08-29",
    "source": "Harvard",
    "batch": "2018"
  },
  "casebody": {
    "judges": [
      "Justice VAUGHN did not participate in the consideration or decision of this case."
    ],
    "parties": [
      "STATE OF NORTH CAROLINA v. WINSTON FRED WILLIAMS"
    ],
    "opinions": [
      {
        "text": "PER CURIAM.\nThis case is remanded to the Superior Court, Wake County, for a plenary hearing in the nature of a motion for appropriate relief upon defendant\u2019s allegations of ineffective assistance of counsel.\nRemanded.\nJustice VAUGHN did not participate in the consideration or decision of this case.",
        "type": "majority",
        "author": "PER CURIAM."
      }
    ],
    "attorneys": [
      "Rufus L. Edmisten, by Walter M. Smith, Assistant Attorney General, for the State-appellee.",
      "Robert E. Zaytoun, for defendant-appellant."
    ],
    "corrections": "",
    "head_matter": "STATE OF NORTH CAROLINA v. WINSTON FRED WILLIAMS\nNo. 113PA84\n(Filed 8 January 1985)\nBEFORE Martin, J., and a jury, at the 8 October 1979 Criminal Session of WAKE County Superior Court, defendant was found guilty of second-degree rape and first-degree burglary and sentenced to life imprisonment on the burglary conviction with a concurrent twenty-five year to life term on the rape conviction. Defendant timely appealed to this Court requesting that an examination be made of the record to determine if any prejudicial error occurred at defendant\u2019s trial. We held that there was no error and affirmed the conviction. State v. Williams, 300 N.C. 190, 265 S.E. 2d 215 (1980).\nPursuant to 28 U.S.C. \u00a7 2254, defendant brought an action for writ of habeas corpus in the United States District Court for the Eastern District of North Carolina. On 3 January 1984, the Honorable Franklin T. Dupree, Jr., ordered that the writ should issue and defendant\u2019s conviction be vacated unless the North Carolina appellate courts conducted a direct review of defendant\u2019s conviction within sixty days. Thereafter, on 5 March 1984, defendant filed with this Court his petition for certiorari, pursuant to Rule 21 of the North Carolina Rules of Appellate Procedure. Defendant\u2019s petition was allowed by this Court on 3 April 1984. On 25 June 1984, the State of North Carolina certified to the United States District Court for the Eastern District of North Carolina that the State had complied with the order of the Honorable Franklin T. Dupree, Jr.\nRufus L. Edmisten, by Walter M. Smith, Assistant Attorney General, for the State-appellee.\nRobert E. Zaytoun, for defendant-appellant."
  },
  "file_name": "0617-01",
  "first_page_order": 647,
  "last_page_order": 648
}