{
  "id": 4749784,
  "name": "ROCHELLE L. EASON v. GOULD, INCORPORATED and EMPLOYMENT SECURITY COMMISSION OF NORTH CAROLINA",
  "name_abbreviation": "Eason v. Gould, Inc.",
  "decision_date": "1985-01-08",
  "docket_number": "No. 276PA84",
  "first_page": "618",
  "last_page": "618",
  "citations": [
    {
      "type": "official",
      "cite": "312 N.C. 618"
    }
  ],
  "court": {
    "name_abbreviation": "N.C.",
    "id": 9292,
    "name": "Supreme Court of North Carolina"
  },
  "jurisdiction": {
    "id": 5,
    "name_long": "North Carolina",
    "name": "N.C."
  },
  "cites_to": [
    {
      "cite": "311 S.E. 2d 372",
      "category": "reporters:state_regional",
      "reporter": "S.E.2d",
      "year": 1984,
      "opinion_index": -1
    },
    {
      "cite": "66 N.C. App. 260",
      "category": "reporters:state",
      "reporter": "N.C. App.",
      "case_ids": [
        8524329
      ],
      "year": 1984,
      "opinion_index": -1,
      "case_paths": [
        "/nc-app/66/0260-01"
      ]
    },
    {
      "cite": "210 S.E. 2d 260",
      "category": "reporters:state_regional",
      "reporter": "S.E.2d",
      "year": 1974,
      "opinion_index": 0
    },
    {
      "cite": "286 N.C. 331",
      "category": "reporters:state",
      "reporter": "N.C.",
      "case_ids": [
        8565452
      ],
      "year": 1974,
      "opinion_index": 0,
      "case_paths": [
        "/nc/286/0331-01"
      ]
    }
  ],
  "analysis": {
    "cardinality": 112,
    "char_count": 1373,
    "ocr_confidence": 0.807,
    "pagerank": {
      "raw": 1.379011341649076e-07,
      "percentile": 0.640120138278332
    },
    "sha256": "a94e4ba7f7e55327d20c0540f855de9e8b8f0af9859ec0fa47069d9c5dfe9d85",
    "simhash": "1:0d17f71c63e7e66d",
    "word_count": 225
  },
  "last_updated": "2023-07-14T18:10:57.145273+00:00",
  "provenance": {
    "date_added": "2019-08-29",
    "source": "Harvard",
    "batch": "2018"
  },
  "casebody": {
    "judges": [],
    "parties": [
      "ROCHELLE L. EASON v. GOULD, INCORPORATED and EMPLOYMENT SECURITY COMMISSION OF NORTH CAROLINA"
    ],
    "opinions": [
      {
        "text": "PER CURIAM.\nJustice Vaughn took no part in the consideration or decision of this case. The remaining members of this Court being equally divided, with three members voting to affirm the Court of Appeals and three members voting to reverse, the decision of the Court of Appeals is left undisturbed and stands without precedential value. See State v. Johnson, 286 N.C. 331, 210 S.E. 2d 260 (1974).\nAffirmed.",
        "type": "majority",
        "author": "PER CURIAM."
      }
    ],
    "attorneys": [
      "Central Community Legal Services, by Victor J. Boone, for claimant-appe lie e.",
      "Donald R. Teeter for the Employment Security Commission of North Carolina."
    ],
    "corrections": "",
    "head_matter": "ROCHELLE L. EASON v. GOULD, INCORPORATED and EMPLOYMENT SECURITY COMMISSION OF NORTH CAROLINA\nNo. 276PA84\n(Filed 8 January 1985)\nAppeal and Error \u00a7 46\u2014 equally divided court \u2014 Court of Appeals decision affirmed \u2014 no precedent\nWhere one member of the Supreme Court did not participate in the consideration or decision of the case, and the remaining six members of the Supreme Court are equally divided, the decision of the Court of Appeals is left undisturbed and stands without precedential value.\nJustice Vaughn took no part in the consideration or decision of this case.\nOn discretionary review of a decision of the Court of Appeals, 66 N.C. App. 260, 311 S.E. 2d 372 (1984) affirming in part and reversing in part a judgment of the Superior Court, Wake County, and remanding the cause for further proceedings.\nCentral Community Legal Services, by Victor J. Boone, for claimant-appe lie e.\nDonald R. Teeter for the Employment Security Commission of North Carolina."
  },
  "file_name": "0618-01",
  "first_page_order": 648,
  "last_page_order": 648
}