{
  "id": 4722011,
  "name": "GABRIEL WILLIAM ST. CLAIR and SANDRA PRICE v. MAVIS ST. CLAIR RAKESTRAW and husband, OLIN RAKESTRAW",
  "name_abbreviation": "St. Clair v. Rakestraw",
  "decision_date": "1985-02-27",
  "docket_number": "No. 218A84",
  "first_page": "171",
  "last_page": "172",
  "citations": [
    {
      "type": "official",
      "cite": "313 N.C. 171"
    }
  ],
  "court": {
    "name_abbreviation": "N.C.",
    "id": 9292,
    "name": "Supreme Court of North Carolina"
  },
  "jurisdiction": {
    "id": 5,
    "name_long": "North Carolina",
    "name": "N.C."
  },
  "cites_to": [
    {
      "cite": "313 S.E. 2d 228",
      "category": "reporters:state_regional",
      "reporter": "S.E.2d",
      "year": 1984,
      "opinion_index": -1
    },
    {
      "cite": "67 N.C. App. 602",
      "category": "reporters:state",
      "reporter": "N.C. App.",
      "case_ids": [
        8526940
      ],
      "year": 1984,
      "opinion_index": -1,
      "case_paths": [
        "/nc-app/67/0602-01"
      ]
    }
  ],
  "analysis": {
    "cardinality": 129,
    "char_count": 1680,
    "ocr_confidence": 0.841,
    "pagerank": {
      "raw": 7.012941857430613e-08,
      "percentile": 0.42348106009269265
    },
    "sha256": "3645b29944bf1499df95f7f0df60597b29c5c15a360c07fde0f563cad872808d",
    "simhash": "1:0f1bf4bb776d85fe",
    "word_count": 290
  },
  "last_updated": "2023-07-14T20:24:31.098159+00:00",
  "provenance": {
    "date_added": "2019-08-29",
    "source": "Harvard",
    "batch": "2018"
  },
  "casebody": {
    "judges": [
      "Justice VAUGHN took no part in the consideration or decision of this case."
    ],
    "parties": [
      "GABRIEL WILLIAM ST. CLAIR and SANDRA PRICE v. MAVIS ST. CLAIR RAKESTRAW and husband, OLIN RAKESTRAW"
    ],
    "opinions": [
      {
        "text": "PER CURIAM.\nThe decision of the Court of Appeals is contained in an opinion by Judge Phillips with Judge Eagles concurring in the result and Judge Arnold dissenting. The Court of Appeals held that \u201cAs to the defendant appellant\u2019s appeal, the judgment is reversed and the cause remanded for a new trial. As to the issues raised by the plaintiff appellees, the trial court\u2019s rulings are affirmed.\u201d\nFor the reasons set forth in both the opinion by Judge Phillips and the dissent of Judge Arnold, we affirm that part of the decision of the Court of Appeals which affirmed the trial court\u2019s rulings as to the issues the plaintiffs sought to raise on appeal. For the reasons set forth and fully discussed in Judge Arnold\u2019s dissent, we reverse that part of the decision of the Court of Appeals which reversed the judgment of the trial court and remanded this case for a new trial. This case is remanded to the Court of Appeals with instructions to reinstate the judgment entered by the trial court on 27 April 1982.\nAffirmed in part, reversed in part and remanded.\nJustice VAUGHN took no part in the consideration or decision of this case.",
        "type": "majority",
        "author": "PER CURIAM."
      }
    ],
    "attorneys": [
      "Joseph Warren III and India Early Keith for plaintiff appellants.",
      "Badger, Johnson, Chapman and Michael, P.A., by David R. Badger, for defendant appellee."
    ],
    "corrections": "",
    "head_matter": "GABRIEL WILLIAM ST. CLAIR and SANDRA PRICE v. MAVIS ST. CLAIR RAKESTRAW and husband, OLIN RAKESTRAW\nNo. 218A84\n(Filed 27 February 1985)\nAppeal of right from the decision of a divided panel of the Court of Appeals, 67 N.C. App. 602, 313 S.E. 2d 228 (1984), reversing the judgment entered by Judge Claude S. Sitton on 27 April 1982 in Superior Court, MECKLENBURG County. Heard 13 December 1984.\nJoseph Warren III and India Early Keith for plaintiff appellants.\nBadger, Johnson, Chapman and Michael, P.A., by David R. Badger, for defendant appellee."
  },
  "file_name": "0171-01",
  "first_page_order": 201,
  "last_page_order": 202
}