{
  "id": 4724629,
  "name": "STATE OF NORTH CAROLINA v. L. J. HUNT",
  "name_abbreviation": "State v. Hunt",
  "decision_date": "1985-06-04",
  "docket_number": "No. 74A85",
  "first_page": "593",
  "last_page": "594",
  "citations": [
    {
      "type": "official",
      "cite": "313 N.C. 593"
    }
  ],
  "court": {
    "name_abbreviation": "N.C.",
    "id": 9292,
    "name": "Supreme Court of North Carolina"
  },
  "jurisdiction": {
    "id": 5,
    "name_long": "North Carolina",
    "name": "N.C."
  },
  "cites_to": [
    {
      "cite": "323 S.E. 2d 490",
      "category": "reporters:state_regional",
      "reporter": "S.E.2d",
      "year": 1984,
      "opinion_index": -1
    },
    {
      "cite": "72 N.C. App. 59",
      "category": "reporters:state",
      "reporter": "N.C. App.",
      "case_ids": [
        8526220
      ],
      "year": 1984,
      "opinion_index": -1,
      "case_paths": [
        "/nc-app/72/0059-01"
      ]
    },
    {
      "cite": "210 S.E. 2d 260",
      "category": "reporters:state_regional",
      "reporter": "S.E.2d",
      "year": 1974,
      "opinion_index": 0
    },
    {
      "cite": "286 N.C. 331",
      "category": "reporters:state",
      "reporter": "N.C.",
      "case_ids": [
        8565452
      ],
      "year": 1974,
      "opinion_index": 0,
      "case_paths": [
        "/nc/286/0331-01"
      ]
    }
  ],
  "analysis": {
    "cardinality": 136,
    "char_count": 1431,
    "ocr_confidence": 0.757,
    "pagerank": {
      "raw": 5.7056350537741696e-08,
      "percentile": 0.3583481121872356
    },
    "sha256": "3d7e63bcd2e622744b0120287bdd985ce72184e4e1f5c958483e9b7013e64069",
    "simhash": "1:ad0e3c9617e3c4dd",
    "word_count": 239
  },
  "last_updated": "2023-07-14T20:24:31.098159+00:00",
  "provenance": {
    "date_added": "2019-08-29",
    "source": "Harvard",
    "batch": "2018"
  },
  "casebody": {
    "judges": [],
    "parties": [
      "STATE OF NORTH CAROLINA v. L. J. HUNT"
    ],
    "opinions": [
      {
        "text": "PER CURIAM.\nJustice Vaughn took no part in the consideration or decision of this case. The remaining members of this Court were equally divided with three members voting to affirm the decision of the Court of Appeals and three members voting to reverse. Therefore, the decision of the Court of Appeals is left undisturbed and stands without precedential value. See State v. Johnson, 286 N.C. 331, 210 S.E. 2d 260 (1974).\nAffirmed.",
        "type": "majority",
        "author": "PER CURIAM."
      }
    ],
    "attorneys": [
      "Lacy H. Thornburg, Attorney General, by T. Byron Smith, Associate Attorney, for the State.",
      "Adam Stein, Appellate Defender, and James R. Glover, for defendant-appe llant."
    ],
    "corrections": "",
    "head_matter": "STATE OF NORTH CAROLINA v. L. J. HUNT\nNo. 74A85\n(Filed 4 June 1985)\nCriminal Law \u00a7 177\u2014 evenly divided Court \u2014 judgment affirmed \u2014 no precedent\nWhere one member of the Supreme Court did not participate in the consideration or decision of a case and the remaining six justices are equally divided, the decision of the Court of Appeals is affirmed and stands without precedential value.\nAppeal by defendant pursuant to N.C.6.S. 7A-30(2) from the decision of a divided panel of the North Carolina Court of Appeals, 72 N.C. App. 59, 323 S.E. 2d 490 (1984) {Chief Judge Vaughn and Judge Johnson concurring; Judge Whichard dissenting), finding no error in the trial before Judge Giles R. Clark and a jury. Judge Clark imposed a sentence of imprisonment of fifteen years upon the jury\u2019s verdict of guilty of murder in the second degree.\nLacy H. Thornburg, Attorney General, by T. Byron Smith, Associate Attorney, for the State.\nAdam Stein, Appellate Defender, and James R. Glover, for defendant-appe llant."
  },
  "file_name": "0593-01",
  "first_page_order": 623,
  "last_page_order": 624
}