{
  "id": 4726019,
  "name": "STATE v. AIKEN",
  "name_abbreviation": "State v. Aiken",
  "decision_date": "1985-06-04",
  "docket_number": "No. 229P85",
  "first_page": "604",
  "last_page": "604",
  "citations": [
    {
      "type": "official",
      "cite": "313 N.C. 604"
    }
  ],
  "court": {
    "name_abbreviation": "N.C.",
    "id": 9292,
    "name": "Supreme Court of North Carolina"
  },
  "jurisdiction": {
    "id": 5,
    "name_long": "North Carolina",
    "name": "N.C."
  },
  "cites_to": [
    {
      "cite": "73 N.C. App. 487",
      "category": "reporters:state",
      "reporter": "N.C. App.",
      "case_ids": [
        8524733
      ],
      "opinion_index": -1,
      "case_paths": [
        "/nc-app/73/0487-01"
      ]
    }
  ],
  "analysis": {
    "cardinality": 36,
    "char_count": 255,
    "ocr_confidence": 0.84,
    "pagerank": {
      "raw": 4.03580807328026e-08,
      "percentile": 0.15310255539994802
    },
    "sha256": "ba92ce947b8daa63ff66ebc0e2194c8e17ea5222144c09b9683d26b6b8d36b88",
    "simhash": "1:6bc9806bdf6c80b4",
    "word_count": 41
  },
  "last_updated": "2023-07-14T20:24:31.098159+00:00",
  "provenance": {
    "date_added": "2019-08-29",
    "source": "Harvard",
    "batch": "2018"
  },
  "casebody": {
    "judges": [],
    "parties": [
      "STATE v. AIKEN"
    ],
    "opinions": [
      {
        "text": "Petition by defendant for discretionary review under G.S. 7A-31 denied 4 June 1985. Motion by Attorney General to dismiss appeal for lack of substantial constitutional question allowed 4 June 1985.",
        "type": "majority",
        "author": null
      }
    ],
    "attorneys": [],
    "corrections": "",
    "head_matter": "STATE v. AIKEN\nNo. 229P85.\nCase below: 73 N.C. App. 487."
  },
  "file_name": "0604-05",
  "first_page_order": 634,
  "last_page_order": 634
}