{
  "id": 4718422,
  "name": "STATE ex rel. BANKING COMM. v. CITICORP SAVINGS INDUS. BANK",
  "name_abbreviation": "State ex rel. Banking Comm. v. Citicorp Savings Indus. Bank",
  "decision_date": "1985-06-04",
  "docket_number": "No. 293PA85",
  "first_page": "611",
  "last_page": "611",
  "citations": [
    {
      "type": "official",
      "cite": "313 N.C. 611"
    }
  ],
  "court": {
    "name_abbreviation": "N.C.",
    "id": 9292,
    "name": "Supreme Court of North Carolina"
  },
  "jurisdiction": {
    "id": 5,
    "name_long": "North Carolina",
    "name": "N.C."
  },
  "cites_to": [
    {
      "cite": "74 N.C. App. 474",
      "category": "reporters:state",
      "reporter": "N.C. App.",
      "case_ids": [
        8525028
      ],
      "opinion_index": -1,
      "case_paths": [
        "/nc-app/74/0474-01"
      ]
    }
  ],
  "analysis": {
    "cardinality": 42,
    "char_count": 300,
    "ocr_confidence": 0.852,
    "pagerank": {
      "raw": 4.03580807328026e-08,
      "percentile": 0.15300139120079972
    },
    "sha256": "a3c54a59910e93d93a33666d28938ee9c69c6be9910ee54869b2b8f1ecb322fb",
    "simhash": "1:fd6b14b05d2695bd",
    "word_count": 48
  },
  "last_updated": "2023-07-14T20:24:31.098159+00:00",
  "provenance": {
    "date_added": "2019-08-29",
    "source": "Harvard",
    "batch": "2018"
  },
  "casebody": {
    "judges": [],
    "parties": [
      "STATE ex rel. BANKING COMM. v. CITICORP SAVINGS INDUS. BANK"
    ],
    "opinions": [
      {
        "text": "Petition by Citicorp for discretionary review under G.S. 7A-31 allowed 4 June 1985. Motion by Attorney General to dismiss appeal for lack of substantial constitutional question denied 4 June 1985.",
        "type": "majority",
        "author": null
      }
    ],
    "attorneys": [],
    "corrections": "",
    "head_matter": "STATE ex rel. BANKING COMM. v. CITICORP SAVINGS INDUS. BANK\nNo. 293PA85.\nCase below: 74 N.C. App. 474."
  },
  "file_name": "0611-04",
  "first_page_order": 641,
  "last_page_order": 641
}