{
  "id": 4694072,
  "name": "HOMER JEFFERSON SIZEMORE v. JEFFREY EUGENE RAXTER and DILLARD EUGENE RAXTER",
  "name_abbreviation": "Sizemore v. Raxter",
  "decision_date": "1985-10-01",
  "docket_number": "No. 228A85",
  "first_page": "527",
  "last_page": "528",
  "citations": [
    {
      "type": "official",
      "cite": "314 N.C. 527"
    }
  ],
  "court": {
    "name_abbreviation": "N.C.",
    "id": 9292,
    "name": "Supreme Court of North Carolina"
  },
  "jurisdiction": {
    "id": 5,
    "name_long": "North Carolina",
    "name": "N.C."
  },
  "cites_to": [
    {
      "cite": "73 N.C. App. 531",
      "category": "reporters:state",
      "reporter": "N.C. App.",
      "case_ids": [
        8524864
      ],
      "year": 1985,
      "pin_cites": [
        {
          "parenthetical": "Judge Johnson, Judge Phillips concurring and Judge Webb dissenting"
        }
      ],
      "opinion_index": -1,
      "case_paths": [
        "/nc-app/73/0531-01"
      ]
    }
  ],
  "analysis": {
    "cardinality": 124,
    "char_count": 1205,
    "ocr_confidence": 0.767,
    "pagerank": {
      "raw": 5.811183091813877e-08,
      "percentile": 0.3618614444317024
    },
    "sha256": "0da433fde73ba165893e3c6e46c0ab0a0dee36a4f22b0c7e5a743005699e197f",
    "simhash": "1:024a34706f0dc507",
    "word_count": 198
  },
  "last_updated": "2023-07-14T18:20:08.801916+00:00",
  "provenance": {
    "date_added": "2019-08-29",
    "source": "Harvard",
    "batch": "2018"
  },
  "casebody": {
    "judges": [],
    "parties": [
      "HOMER JEFFERSON SIZEMORE v. JEFFREY EUGENE RAXTER and DILLARD EUGENE RAXTER"
    ],
    "opinions": [
      {
        "text": "PER CURIAM.\nThis is an action for damages for personal injuries arising out of a collision between the plaintiffs person and the automobile driven by the defendant, Jeffrey Eugene Raxter, and owned by the defendant, Dillard Eugene Raxter. Judge Webb dissented from the decision of the Court of Appeals on the basis that it was error for the trial judge to submit the issue of last clear chance to the jury.\nAfter reviewing the records and briefs and hearing the oral argument on the question presented by this appeal, we conclude that the majority opinion of the Court of Appeals is correct and should be affirmed.\nAffirmed.",
        "type": "majority",
        "author": "PER CURIAM."
      }
    ],
    "attorneys": [
      "Joseph B. Roberts, III, for plaintiff-appellee.",
      "George C. Collie and Charles M. Welling, for defendant-appellants."
    ],
    "corrections": "",
    "head_matter": "HOMER JEFFERSON SIZEMORE v. JEFFREY EUGENE RAXTER and DILLARD EUGENE RAXTER\nNo. 228A85\n(Filed 1 October 1985)\nAppeal by defendants as a matter of right pursuant to N.C. Gen. Stat. \u00a7 7A-30(2) from a decision of the Court of Appeals, reported at 73 N.C. App. 531, --- S.E. 2d --- (1985) (Judge Johnson, Judge Phillips concurring and Judge Webb dissenting) which affirmed Judge Sitton\u2019s judgment for the plaintiff entered 28 July 1983 in GASTON County Superior Court.\nJoseph B. Roberts, III, for plaintiff-appellee.\nGeorge C. Collie and Charles M. Welling, for defendant-appellants."
  },
  "file_name": "0527-01",
  "first_page_order": 571,
  "last_page_order": 572
}