{
  "id": 4720611,
  "name": "VIRGINIA M. FARR v. THE BOARD OF ADJUSTMENT OF THE CITY OF ROCKY MOUNT, NORTH CAROLINA",
  "name_abbreviation": "Farr v. Board of Adjustment",
  "decision_date": "1985-12-10",
  "docket_number": "No. 206A85",
  "first_page": "309",
  "last_page": "310",
  "citations": [
    {
      "type": "official",
      "cite": "315 N.C. 309"
    }
  ],
  "court": {
    "name_abbreviation": "N.C.",
    "id": 9292,
    "name": "Supreme Court of North Carolina"
  },
  "jurisdiction": {
    "id": 5,
    "name_long": "North Carolina",
    "name": "N.C."
  },
  "cites_to": [
    {
      "cite": "326 S.E. 2d 382",
      "category": "reporters:state_regional",
      "reporter": "S.E.2d",
      "year": 1985,
      "opinion_index": -1
    },
    {
      "cite": "73 N.C. App. 228",
      "category": "reporters:state",
      "reporter": "N.C. App.",
      "case_ids": [
        8523033
      ],
      "year": 1985,
      "opinion_index": -1,
      "case_paths": [
        "/nc-app/73/0228-01"
      ]
    }
  ],
  "analysis": {
    "cardinality": 109,
    "char_count": 1054,
    "ocr_confidence": 0.817,
    "pagerank": {
      "raw": 1.6343475431493036e-07,
      "percentile": 0.689823808260636
    },
    "sha256": "65a692af818cd51ebf8062f8ad5aab05866a89e4aee621bc3c7182308fb0ce49",
    "simhash": "1:103d74bb07a3e54d",
    "word_count": 180
  },
  "last_updated": "2023-07-14T15:13:08.433452+00:00",
  "provenance": {
    "date_added": "2019-08-29",
    "source": "Harvard",
    "batch": "2018"
  },
  "casebody": {
    "judges": [],
    "parties": [
      "VIRGINIA M. FARR v. THE BOARD OF ADJUSTMENT OF THE CITY OF ROCKY MOUNT, NORTH CAROLINA"
    ],
    "opinions": [
      {
        "text": "PER CURIAM.\nOur review of the decision of the Court of Appeals reveals that the case was decided by that court on the basis of the principle of \u201cprior non-conforming use,\u201d an issue not raised or briefed by the parties to this action and not supported by the record. Accordingly, the decision of the Court of Appeals is vacated and the. case is remanded to that court for further consideration of the issues raised by the appellant in her brief filed in the Court of Appeals.\nVacated and remanded.",
        "type": "majority",
        "author": "PER CURIAM."
      }
    ],
    "attorneys": [
      "Dill, Fountain & Hoyle, by William S. Hoyle, for respondent-appellant.",
      "Fitch & Butterfield, by G. K. Butterfield, Jr., for petitionerappellee."
    ],
    "corrections": "",
    "head_matter": "VIRGINIA M. FARR v. THE BOARD OF ADJUSTMENT OF THE CITY OF ROCKY MOUNT, NORTH CAROLINA\nNo. 206A85\n(Filed 10 December 1985)\nAppeal by defendant from a decision of the Court of Appeals, 73 N.C. App. 228, 326 S.E. 2d 382 (1985), one judge dissenting, vacating and remanding judgment entered by Lewis, J., at the 5 August 1983 Civil Session of Superior Court, NASH County. Heard in the Supreme Court 18 November 1985.\nDill, Fountain & Hoyle, by William S. Hoyle, for respondent-appellant.\nFitch & Butterfield, by G. K. Butterfield, Jr., for petitionerappellee."
  },
  "file_name": "0309-01",
  "first_page_order": 337,
  "last_page_order": 338
}