{ "id": 4693276, "name": "STATE OF NORTH CAROLINA v. TERRIS LEE EDMONDSON", "name_abbreviation": "State v. Edmondson", "decision_date": "1986-03-05", "docket_number": "No. 601PA84", "first_page": "187", "last_page": "188", "citations": [ { "type": "official", "cite": "316 N.C. 187" } ], "court": { "name_abbreviation": "N.C.", "id": 9292, "name": "Supreme Court of North Carolina" }, "jurisdiction": { "id": 5, "name_long": "North Carolina", "name": "N.C." }, "cites_to": [ { "cite": "320 S.E. 2d 315", "category": "reporters:state_regional", "reporter": "S.E.2d", "year": 1984, "opinion_index": -1 }, { "cite": "70 N.C. App. 426", "category": "reporters:state", "reporter": "N.C. App.", "case_ids": [ 8522661 ], "year": 1984, "opinion_index": -1, "case_paths": [ "/nc-app/70/0426-01" ] }, { "cite": "340 S.E. 2d 701", "category": "reporters:state_regional", "reporter": "S.E.2d", "year": 1986, "opinion_index": 0 }, { "cite": "315 N.C. 444", "category": "reporters:state", "reporter": "N.C.", "case_ids": [ 4717320 ], "year": 1986, "opinion_index": 0, "case_paths": [ "/nc/315/0444-01" ] }, { "cite": "340 S.E. 2d 701", "category": "reporters:state_regional", "reporter": "S.E.2d", "year": 1986, "opinion_index": 1 }, { "cite": "315 N.C. 444", "category": "reporters:state", "reporter": "N.C.", "case_ids": [ 4717320 ], "year": 1986, "opinion_index": 1, "case_paths": [ "/nc/315/0444-01" ] } ], "analysis": { "cardinality": 216, "char_count": 3175, "ocr_confidence": 0.79, "pagerank": { "raw": 1.4997862646452906e-07, "percentile": 0.6654588742432473 }, "sha256": "c299134a0263fe65f827269bc450d4ae69d5b15288b90310901382d07c7bff54", "simhash": "1:23a0e4076c7a8c4c", "word_count": 511 }, "last_updated": "2023-07-14T16:48:49.336190+00:00", "provenance": { "date_added": "2019-08-29", "source": "Harvard", "batch": "2018" }, "casebody": { "judges": [ "Justice BILLINGS did not participate in the consideration or decision of this case.", "Justice Frye joins in this dissenting opinion." ], "parties": [ "STATE OF NORTH CAROLINA v. TERRIS LEE EDMONDSON" ], "opinions": [ { "text": "MITCHELL, Justice.\nThe defendant\u2019s sole contention is that prohibitions in the Constitution of the United States and the Constitution of North Carolina against placing a person twice in jeopardy prohibited his convictions and punishment, in a single trial, for both felony breaking or entering, N.C.G.S. \u00a7 14-54(a), and felonious larceny based upon the same breaking or entering, N.C.G.S. \u00a7 14-72(b)(2). When faced with the identical question in the recent case of State v. Gardner, 315 N.C. 444, 340 S.E. 2d 701 (1986), we specifically held that conviction and punishment for both such offenses in a single trial is not prohibited by the provisions of either the Constitution of the United States or the Constitution of North Carolina. For reasons fully discussed in Gardner, we conclude that the defendant in the present case received a fair trial free of prejudicial error. The decision of the Court of Appeals is affirmed.\nAffirmed.\nJustice BILLINGS did not participate in the consideration or decision of this case.", "type": "majority", "author": "MITCHELL, Justice." }, { "text": "Justice Exum\ndissenting.\nFor the reasons stated in my dissenting opinion in State v. Gardner, 315 N.C. 444, 340 S.E. 2d 701 (1986), I dissent here from the majority\u2019s resolution of the double jeopardy question.\nJustice Frye joins in this dissenting opinion.", "type": "dissent", "author": "Justice Exum" } ], "attorneys": [ "Lacy H. Thornburg, Attorney General, by William N. Farrell, Jr., Assistant Attorney General, for the State.", "Adam Stein, Appellate Defender, by David W. Dorey, Assistant Appellate Defender, and Louis D. Bilionis, Special Assistant to the Appellate Defender, for the defendant appellant." ], "corrections": "", "head_matter": "STATE OF NORTH CAROLINA v. TERRIS LEE EDMONDSON\nNo. 601PA84\n(Filed 5 March 1986)\nConstitutional Law \u00a7 34; Burglary and Unlawful Breakings \u00a7 1; Larceny \u00a7 1\u2014 one incident \u2014 convictions for breaking or entering and larceny \u2014 no double jeopardy\nProhibitions in the U. S. and N. C. Constitutions against placing a person twice in jeopardy did not prohibit defendant\u2019s convictions and punishment, in a single trial, for both felony breaking or entering and felonious larceny based upon the same breaking or entering.\nJustice Billings did not participate in the consideration or decision of this case.\nJustice Exum dissenting.\nJustice Frye joins in the dissenting opinion.\nOn discretionary review of the decision of the Court of Appeals, 70 N.C. App. 426, 320 S.E. 2d 315 (1984) finding no error in the judgment entered by Preston, J., on 14 April 1983 in Superior Court, Lenoir County. Heard in the Supreme Court on 11 March 1985.\nThe defendant was tried upon proper indictments and convicted by a jury on 14 April 1983 of felonious breaking or entering, felonious larceny, unauthorized use of a conveyance, willful and wanton injury to real property, and two counts of willful and wanton injury to personal property causing more than $200 in damages. The charges were consolidated for judgment, and the trial court sentenced the defendant to a maximum and minimum term of imprisonment of ten years. The defendant appealed to the Court of Appeals which rendered its decision on 18 September 1984 finding no error in the defendant\u2019s trial. The Supreme Court allowed the defendant\u2019s petition for discretionary review.\nLacy H. Thornburg, Attorney General, by William N. Farrell, Jr., Assistant Attorney General, for the State.\nAdam Stein, Appellate Defender, by David W. Dorey, Assistant Appellate Defender, and Louis D. Bilionis, Special Assistant to the Appellate Defender, for the defendant appellant." }, "file_name": "0187-01", "first_page_order": 215, "last_page_order": 216 }