{
  "id": 4702676,
  "name": "SAMUEL COLON and RUSSELL L. SCHELB, JR., Plaintiffs v. F. D. BAILEY and wife, SUE BAILEY, and ROBERT C. PRESSLEY, Defendants, GREAT AMERICAN INSURANCE COMPANY, Proposed Intervenor",
  "name_abbreviation": "Colon v. Bailey",
  "decision_date": "1986-03-05",
  "docket_number": "No. 590A85",
  "first_page": "190",
  "last_page": "190",
  "citations": [
    {
      "type": "official",
      "cite": "316 N.C. 190"
    }
  ],
  "court": {
    "name_abbreviation": "N.C.",
    "id": 9292,
    "name": "Supreme Court of North Carolina"
  },
  "jurisdiction": {
    "id": 5,
    "name_long": "North Carolina",
    "name": "N.C."
  },
  "cites_to": [
    {
      "cite": "333 S.E. 2d 505",
      "category": "reporters:state_regional",
      "reporter": "S.E.2d",
      "year": 1985,
      "opinion_index": -1
    },
    {
      "cite": "76 N.C. App. 491",
      "category": "reporters:state",
      "reporter": "N.C. App.",
      "case_ids": [
        8527522
      ],
      "year": 1985,
      "opinion_index": -1,
      "case_paths": [
        "/nc-app/76/0491-01"
      ]
    }
  ],
  "analysis": {
    "cardinality": 105,
    "char_count": 925,
    "ocr_confidence": 0.815,
    "pagerank": {
      "raw": 8.752859228173931e-08,
      "percentile": 0.4949661157851288
    },
    "sha256": "6e0167cf6f3cc3aa1bd3fab317d9f500c9db23fb4b3fdc2608132125f48e9357",
    "simhash": "1:a63d549b05b3e07c",
    "word_count": 145
  },
  "last_updated": "2023-07-14T16:48:49.336190+00:00",
  "provenance": {
    "date_added": "2019-08-29",
    "source": "Harvard",
    "batch": "2018"
  },
  "casebody": {
    "judges": [],
    "parties": [
      "SAMUEL COLON and RUSSELL L. SCHELB, JR., Plaintiffs v. F. D. BAILEY and wife, SUE BAILEY, and ROBERT C. PRESSLEY, Defendants, GREAT AMERICAN INSURANCE COMPANY, Proposed Intervenor"
    ],
    "opinions": [
      {
        "text": "PER CURIAM.\nFor the reasons stated in the dissenting opinion, the decision of the Court of Appeals is reversed.\nReversed.",
        "type": "majority",
        "author": "PER CURIAM."
      }
    ],
    "attorneys": [
      "Morris, Golding, Phillips & Cloninger, by Thomas R. Bell, Jr., for plaintiff-appellants.",
      "Michael T. Moore & Ronald C. True, for defendant-appellees."
    ],
    "corrections": "",
    "head_matter": "SAMUEL COLON and RUSSELL L. SCHELB, JR., Plaintiffs v. F. D. BAILEY and wife, SUE BAILEY, and ROBERT C. PRESSLEY, Defendants, GREAT AMERICAN INSURANCE COMPANY, Proposed Intervenor\nNo. 590A85\n(Filed 5 March 1986)\nPLAINTIFFS and proposed intervenor appeal as a matter of right, pursuant to N.C.G.S. \u00a7 7A-30(2), from a decision of a divided panel of the Court of Appeals, 76 N.C. App. 491, 333 S.E. 2d 505 (1985), affirming judgment entered by Lewis, J., on 13 September 1984 in Superior Court, BUNCOMBE County, granting summary judgment for defendants and denying the proposed intervenor\u2019s motion to intervene. Heard in the Supreme Court 11 February 1986.\nMorris, Golding, Phillips & Cloninger, by Thomas R. Bell, Jr., for plaintiff-appellants.\nMichael T. Moore & Ronald C. True, for defendant-appellees."
  },
  "file_name": "0190-01",
  "first_page_order": 218,
  "last_page_order": 218
}