{
  "id": 4702590,
  "name": "WILLIAM A. DAVIDSON v. UNITED STATES FIDELITY AND GUARANTY COMPANY",
  "name_abbreviation": "Davidson v. United States Fidelity & Guaranty Co.",
  "decision_date": "1986-05-06",
  "docket_number": "No. 13A86",
  "first_page": "551",
  "last_page": "551",
  "citations": [
    {
      "type": "official",
      "cite": "316 N.C. 551"
    }
  ],
  "court": {
    "name_abbreviation": "N.C.",
    "id": 9292,
    "name": "Supreme Court of North Carolina"
  },
  "jurisdiction": {
    "id": 5,
    "name_long": "North Carolina",
    "name": "N.C."
  },
  "cites_to": [
    {
      "cite": "336 S.E. 2d 709",
      "category": "reporters:state_regional",
      "reporter": "S.E.2d",
      "year": 1985,
      "opinion_index": -1
    },
    {
      "cite": "78 N.C. App. 140",
      "category": "reporters:state",
      "reporter": "N.C. App.",
      "case_ids": [
        8519858
      ],
      "year": 1985,
      "opinion_index": -1,
      "case_paths": [
        "/nc-app/78/0140-01"
      ]
    }
  ],
  "analysis": {
    "cardinality": 115,
    "char_count": 1077,
    "ocr_confidence": 0.779,
    "pagerank": {
      "raw": 2.8031201026477317e-07,
      "percentile": 0.8369881796197385
    },
    "sha256": "8f7faf30a129b0ce6171725e998f0c924f71b12b6820abc1890e7529aaf31c49",
    "simhash": "1:2588373263cf4a3a",
    "word_count": 173
  },
  "last_updated": "2023-07-14T16:48:49.336190+00:00",
  "provenance": {
    "date_added": "2019-08-29",
    "source": "Harvard",
    "batch": "2018"
  },
  "casebody": {
    "judges": [],
    "parties": [
      "WILLIAM A. DAVIDSON v. UNITED STATES FIDELITY AND GUARANTY COMPANY"
    ],
    "opinions": [
      {
        "text": "PER CURIAM.\nPlaintiff seeks a declaratory judgment that he is entitled to recover under his \u201cunderinsured motorist\u201d coverage provided in his automobile liability policy issued by defendant. Both the trial court and a majority of the Court of Appeals, one judge dissenting, concluded that plaintiff was not entitled to any benefits under his underinsured motorist coverage. We agree. The decision of the Court of Appeals is, therefore,\nAffirmed.",
        "type": "majority",
        "author": "PER CURIAM."
      }
    ],
    "attorneys": [
      "Lewis, Babcock, Gregory & Pleicones by A. Camden Lewis and Daryl G. Hawkins; Hamel, Hamel & Pearce, P.A., by Hugo A. Pearce, III and Reginald S. Hamel for plaintiff appellant.",
      "Jones, Hewson & Woolard by Harry C. Hewson and Hunter M. Jones for defendant appellee."
    ],
    "corrections": "",
    "head_matter": "WILLIAM A. DAVIDSON v. UNITED STATES FIDELITY AND GUARANTY COMPANY\nNo. 13A86\n(Filed 6 May 1986)\nAPPEAL by plaintiff pursuant to N.C.G.S. \u00a7 7A-30(2) from a decision by a divided panel of the Court of Appeals, 78 N.C. App. 140, 336 S.E. 2d 709 (1985), affirming summary judgment for defendant entered by Judge Burroughs on 10 December 1984 in Mecklenburg Superior Court.\nLewis, Babcock, Gregory & Pleicones by A. Camden Lewis and Daryl G. Hawkins; Hamel, Hamel & Pearce, P.A., by Hugo A. Pearce, III and Reginald S. Hamel for plaintiff appellant.\nJones, Hewson & Woolard by Harry C. Hewson and Hunter M. Jones for defendant appellee."
  },
  "file_name": "0551-01",
  "first_page_order": 579,
  "last_page_order": 579
}