{
  "id": 4697526,
  "name": "STATE v. TRANSEAU",
  "name_abbreviation": "State v. Transeau",
  "decision_date": "1986",
  "docket_number": "No. 242PA86",
  "first_page": "737",
  "last_page": "737",
  "citations": [
    {
      "type": "official",
      "cite": "316 N.C. 737"
    }
  ],
  "court": {
    "name_abbreviation": "N.C.",
    "id": 9292,
    "name": "Supreme Court of North Carolina"
  },
  "jurisdiction": {
    "id": 5,
    "name_long": "North Carolina",
    "name": "N.C."
  },
  "cites_to": [
    {
      "cite": "79 N.C. App. 666",
      "category": "reporters:state",
      "reporter": "N.C. App.",
      "case_ids": [
        8523067
      ],
      "opinion_index": -1,
      "case_paths": [
        "/nc-app/79/0666-01"
      ]
    }
  ],
  "analysis": {
    "cardinality": 45,
    "char_count": 374,
    "ocr_confidence": 0.863,
    "sha256": "0c2c4d636b382e3ee714075b4cb1a090a5a0a031793f51084bd92875d5c08179",
    "simhash": "1:8fc55a60daf1d77f",
    "word_count": 61
  },
  "last_updated": "2023-07-14T16:48:49.336190+00:00",
  "provenance": {
    "date_added": "2019-08-29",
    "source": "Harvard",
    "batch": "2018"
  },
  "casebody": {
    "judges": [],
    "parties": [
      "STATE v. TRANSEAU"
    ],
    "opinions": [
      {
        "text": "Petition by defendant for discretionary review pursuant to G.S. 7A-31 allowed 6 May 1986 to consider only the issues of validity of search; admissibility of evidence seized in search; and trial court\u2019s summary of evidence in its jury instruction. Petition by defendant for writ of supersedeas allowed 6 May 1986.",
        "type": "majority",
        "author": null
      }
    ],
    "attorneys": [],
    "corrections": "",
    "head_matter": "STATE v. TRANSEAU\nNo. 242PA86.\nCase below: 79 N.C. App. 666."
  },
  "file_name": "0737-02",
  "first_page_order": 765,
  "last_page_order": 765
}