{
  "id": 4776029,
  "name": "STATE OF NORTH CAROLINA v. RONNIE L. MOORE",
  "name_abbreviation": "State v. Moore",
  "decision_date": "1986-06-03",
  "docket_number": "No. 771PA85",
  "first_page": "144",
  "last_page": "144",
  "citations": [
    {
      "type": "official",
      "cite": "317 N.C. 144"
    }
  ],
  "court": {
    "name_abbreviation": "N.C.",
    "id": 9292,
    "name": "Supreme Court of North Carolina"
  },
  "jurisdiction": {
    "id": 5,
    "name_long": "North Carolina",
    "name": "N.C."
  },
  "cites_to": [
    {
      "cite": "335 S.E. 2d 535",
      "category": "reporters:state_regional",
      "reporter": "S.E.2d",
      "year": 1985,
      "opinion_index": -1
    },
    {
      "cite": "77 N.C. App. 553",
      "category": "reporters:state",
      "reporter": "N.C. App.",
      "case_ids": [
        8524174
      ],
      "year": 1985,
      "opinion_index": -1,
      "case_paths": [
        "/nc-app/77/0553-01"
      ]
    },
    {
      "cite": "324 S.E. 2d 224",
      "category": "reporters:state_regional",
      "reporter": "S.E.2d",
      "year": 1985,
      "opinion_index": 0
    },
    {
      "cite": "312 N.C. 619",
      "category": "reporters:state",
      "reporter": "N.C.",
      "case_ids": [
        4756385
      ],
      "year": 1985,
      "opinion_index": 0,
      "case_paths": [
        "/nc/312/0619-01"
      ]
    }
  ],
  "analysis": {
    "cardinality": 109,
    "char_count": 1029,
    "ocr_confidence": 0.76,
    "pagerank": {
      "raw": 7.47672734914224e-08,
      "percentile": 0.4455018419992826
    },
    "sha256": "37d56db90fe9301c0deda3ef3838a21defa663b39b7f815304738f6f079fc11d",
    "simhash": "1:1fd77438463f85df",
    "word_count": 171
  },
  "last_updated": "2023-07-14T14:55:24.016055+00:00",
  "provenance": {
    "date_added": "2019-08-29",
    "source": "Harvard",
    "batch": "2018"
  },
  "casebody": {
    "judges": [
      "Justice BILLINGS did not participate in the consideration or decision of this case."
    ],
    "parties": [
      "STATE OF NORTH CAROLINA v. RONNIE L. MOORE"
    ],
    "opinions": [
      {
        "text": "PER CURIAM.\nThe Court is evenly divided. Under these circumstances, following the uniform practice of this Court and the ancient rule of praesumitur pro negante, the decision of the Court of Appeals is affirmed, not as precedent but as the decision in this case. Lynch v. Hazelwood, 312 N.C. 619, 324 S.E. 2d 224 (1985).\nAffirmed.\nJustice BILLINGS did not participate in the consideration or decision of this case.",
        "type": "majority",
        "author": "PER CURIAM."
      }
    ],
    "attorneys": [
      "Lacy H. Thornburg, Attorney General, by Victor H. E. Morgan, Jr., Assistant Attorney General, for the State.",
      "Malcolm Ray Hunter, Jr., Appellate Defender, by Robin E. Hudson, Assistant Appellate Defender, for defendant."
    ],
    "corrections": "",
    "head_matter": "STATE OF NORTH CAROLINA v. RONNIE L. MOORE\nNo. 771PA85\n(Filed 3 June 1986)\nOn defendant\u2019s petition for discretionary review of the decision of the Court of Appeals, 77 N.C. App. 553, 335 S.E. 2d 535 (1985), which found no error in the trial and conviction of defendant before Rousseau, J., at the 5 November 1984 session of Superior Court, WILKES County. Heard in the Supreme Court 12 May 1986.\nLacy H. Thornburg, Attorney General, by Victor H. E. Morgan, Jr., Assistant Attorney General, for the State.\nMalcolm Ray Hunter, Jr., Appellate Defender, by Robin E. Hudson, Assistant Appellate Defender, for defendant."
  },
  "file_name": "0144-01",
  "first_page_order": 180,
  "last_page_order": 180
}