{
  "id": 4778905,
  "name": "ROMER G. TAYLOR v. RAMON A. BRITTAIN and wife, NELLIE TAYLOR BRITTAIN",
  "name_abbreviation": "Taylor v. Brittain",
  "decision_date": "1986-06-03",
  "docket_number": "No. 633PA85",
  "first_page": "146",
  "last_page": "146",
  "citations": [
    {
      "type": "official",
      "cite": "317 N.C. 146"
    }
  ],
  "court": {
    "name_abbreviation": "N.C.",
    "id": 9292,
    "name": "Supreme Court of North Carolina"
  },
  "jurisdiction": {
    "id": 5,
    "name_long": "North Carolina",
    "name": "N.C."
  },
  "cites_to": [
    {
      "cite": "334 S.E. 2d 242",
      "category": "reporters:state_regional",
      "reporter": "S.E.2d",
      "year": 1985,
      "opinion_index": -1
    },
    {
      "cite": "76 N.C. App. 574",
      "category": "reporters:state",
      "reporter": "N.C. App.",
      "case_ids": [
        8527682
      ],
      "year": 1985,
      "opinion_index": -1,
      "case_paths": [
        "/nc-app/76/0574-01"
      ]
    }
  ],
  "analysis": {
    "cardinality": 110,
    "char_count": 1168,
    "ocr_confidence": 0.82,
    "pagerank": {
      "raw": 5.7738366328965145e-08,
      "percentile": 0.3606262372825597
    },
    "sha256": "f193821db987f94845a387ae262a63501c0ed5c7d01eff7cb4f3d2d08c4d7671",
    "simhash": "1:207bce316d07c6ca",
    "word_count": 190
  },
  "last_updated": "2023-07-14T14:55:24.016055+00:00",
  "provenance": {
    "date_added": "2019-08-29",
    "source": "Harvard",
    "batch": "2018"
  },
  "casebody": {
    "judges": [],
    "parties": [
      "ROMER G. TAYLOR v. RAMON A. BRITTAIN and wife, NELLIE TAYLOR BRITTAIN"
    ],
    "opinions": [
      {
        "text": "PER CURIAM.\nThe decision of the Court of Appeals reversing entry of partial summary judgment in favor of the respondents and remanding to the trial court for further proceedings is affirmed. We disavow, however, the language of the Court of Appeals relating to the correction deed from the petitioner\u2019s grantor to the petitioner and the holding that the deed is void due to the statute of limitations and the intervening rights of the respondents.\nModified and affirmed.",
        "type": "majority",
        "author": "PER CURIAM."
      }
    ],
    "attorneys": [
      "McMurray & McMurray, by John H. McMurray, for respondent-appellants.",
      "Simpson, Aycock, Beyer & Simpson, P.A., by Samuel E. Ay-cock and Michael Doran, for petitioner-appellee."
    ],
    "corrections": "",
    "head_matter": "ROMER G. TAYLOR v. RAMON A. BRITTAIN and wife, NELLIE TAYLOR BRITTAIN\nNo. 633PA85\n(Filed 3 June 1986)\nRespondents\u2019 petition for discretionary review pursuant to N.C.G.S. \u00a7 7A-31 of a decision of the Court of Appeals, 76 N.C. App. 574, 334 S.E. 2d 242 (1985), was allowed 18 February 1986. The Court of Appeals reversed partial summary judgment entered by the trial court in favor of the respondents in a special proceeding to establish a boundary line under N.C.G.S. \u00a7 38-1, et seq. Heard in the Supreme Court 12 May 1986.\nMcMurray & McMurray, by John H. McMurray, for respondent-appellants.\nSimpson, Aycock, Beyer & Simpson, P.A., by Samuel E. Ay-cock and Michael Doran, for petitioner-appellee."
  },
  "file_name": "0146-01",
  "first_page_order": 182,
  "last_page_order": 182
}