{
  "id": 4774529,
  "name": "WILLIAM DOUGLAS VICK and PATRICIA VICK v. DARRELL ST. CLAIR DAVIS",
  "name_abbreviation": "Vick v. Davis",
  "decision_date": "1986-07-02",
  "docket_number": "No. 654A85",
  "first_page": "328",
  "last_page": "329",
  "citations": [
    {
      "type": "official",
      "cite": "317 N.C. 328"
    }
  ],
  "court": {
    "name_abbreviation": "N.C.",
    "id": 9292,
    "name": "Supreme Court of North Carolina"
  },
  "jurisdiction": {
    "id": 5,
    "name_long": "North Carolina",
    "name": "N.C."
  },
  "cites_to": [
    {
      "cite": "335 S.E. 2d 197",
      "category": "reporters:state_regional",
      "reporter": "S.E.2d",
      "year": 1985,
      "opinion_index": -1
    },
    {
      "cite": "77 N.C. App. 359",
      "category": "reporters:state",
      "reporter": "N.C. App.",
      "case_ids": [
        8522452
      ],
      "year": 1985,
      "opinion_index": -1,
      "case_paths": [
        "/nc-app/77/0359-01"
      ]
    },
    {
      "cite": "324 S.E. 2d 224",
      "category": "reporters:state_regional",
      "reporter": "S.E.2d",
      "year": 1985,
      "opinion_index": 0
    },
    {
      "cite": "312 N.C. 619",
      "category": "reporters:state",
      "reporter": "N.C.",
      "case_ids": [
        4756385
      ],
      "year": 1985,
      "opinion_index": 0,
      "case_paths": [
        "/nc/312/0619-01"
      ]
    }
  ],
  "analysis": {
    "cardinality": 131,
    "char_count": 1299,
    "ocr_confidence": 0.771,
    "pagerank": {
      "raw": 1.0472576634184644e-07,
      "percentile": 0.5525837606748502
    },
    "sha256": "9239354572d4b7fe09cb2cd13449ce0522fe16416c216e2ce128c5abb4c9cb9c",
    "simhash": "1:0f71742b3c3bd4cb",
    "word_count": 211
  },
  "last_updated": "2023-07-14T14:55:24.016055+00:00",
  "provenance": {
    "date_added": "2019-08-29",
    "source": "Harvard",
    "batch": "2018"
  },
  "casebody": {
    "judges": [],
    "parties": [
      "WILLIAM DOUGLAS VICK and PATRICIA VICK v. DARRELL ST. CLAIR DAVIS"
    ],
    "opinions": [
      {
        "text": "PER CURIAM.\nJustice Martin having recused, the Court is evenly divided. Under these circumstances, following the uniform practice of this Court, the decision of the Court of Appeals is affirmed, not as precedent but as the decision in this case. Lynch v. Hazelwood, 312 N.C. 619, 324 S.E. 2d 224 (1985).\nAffirmed.",
        "type": "majority",
        "author": "PER CURIAM."
      }
    ],
    "attorneys": [
      "Sanford Adams McCullough & Beard, by Charles C. Meeker and Cynthia Leigh Wittmer, for plaintiff-appellees.",
      "Moore, Ragsdale, Liggett, Ray & Foley, P.A., by George R. Ragsdale, Nancy Dail Fountain, and Jane Flowers Finch, for defendant-appe llant."
    ],
    "corrections": "",
    "head_matter": "WILLIAM DOUGLAS VICK and PATRICIA VICK v. DARRELL ST. CLAIR DAVIS\nNo. 654A85\n(Filed 2 July 1986)\nAppeal and Error \u00a7 46\u2014 evenly divided court \u2014 Court of Appeals decision affirmed \u2014no precedent\nWhere one member of the Supreme Court recused himself, and the remaining members of the Supreme Court were evenly divided, the decision of the Court of Appeals was affirmed but stood without precedential value.\nAppeal by defendant pursuant to N.C.G.S. \u00a7 7A-30(2) from the decision of a divided panel of the Court of Appeals, reported in 77 N.C. App. 359, 335 S.E. 2d 197 (1985), which affirmed default judgment against defendant signed by Brannon, J., on 18 December 1984, in Superior Court, WAKE County. Heard in the Supreme Court 12 March 1986.\nSanford Adams McCullough & Beard, by Charles C. Meeker and Cynthia Leigh Wittmer, for plaintiff-appellees.\nMoore, Ragsdale, Liggett, Ray & Foley, P.A., by George R. Ragsdale, Nancy Dail Fountain, and Jane Flowers Finch, for defendant-appe llant."
  },
  "file_name": "0328-01",
  "first_page_order": 364,
  "last_page_order": 365
}