{
  "id": 4744629,
  "name": "STATE v. SMITH",
  "name_abbreviation": "State v. Smith",
  "decision_date": "1987-03-04",
  "docket_number": "No. 691P86",
  "first_page": "226",
  "last_page": "226",
  "citations": [
    {
      "type": "official",
      "cite": "319 N.C. 226"
    }
  ],
  "court": {
    "name_abbreviation": "N.C.",
    "id": 9292,
    "name": "Supreme Court of North Carolina"
  },
  "jurisdiction": {
    "id": 5,
    "name_long": "North Carolina",
    "name": "N.C."
  },
  "cites_to": [
    {
      "cite": "83 N.C. App. 160",
      "category": "reporters:state",
      "reporter": "N.C. App.",
      "opinion_index": -1
    }
  ],
  "analysis": {
    "cardinality": 36,
    "char_count": 263,
    "ocr_confidence": 0.855,
    "sha256": "29a4ee6b8de7dd65e17169ec0199d7b4b2b62dcd8cb6174ae42422a87395e8d0",
    "simhash": "1:0ab8946bdfe2f0c8",
    "word_count": 42
  },
  "last_updated": "2023-07-14T21:18:01.553874+00:00",
  "provenance": {
    "date_added": "2019-08-29",
    "source": "Harvard",
    "batch": "2018"
  },
  "casebody": {
    "judges": [],
    "parties": [
      "STATE v. SMITH"
    ],
    "opinions": [
      {
        "text": "Petition by defendant for discretionary review pursuant to G.S. 7A-31 denied 4 March 1987. Motion by Attorney General to dismiss appeal for lack of substantial constitutional question allowed 4 March 1987.",
        "type": "majority",
        "author": null
      }
    ],
    "attorneys": [],
    "corrections": "",
    "head_matter": "STATE v. SMITH\nNo. 691P86.\nCase below: 83 N.C. App. 160."
  },
  "file_name": "0226-03",
  "first_page_order": 258,
  "last_page_order": 258
}