{
  "id": 1972655,
  "name": "THE STATE vs. JAMES RAY, SEN., & AL.",
  "name_abbreviation": "State v. Ray",
  "decision_date": "1849-08",
  "docket_number": "",
  "first_page": "29",
  "last_page": "30",
  "citations": [
    {
      "type": "nominative",
      "cite": "10 Ired. 29"
    },
    {
      "type": "official",
      "cite": "32 N.C. 29"
    }
  ],
  "court": {
    "name_abbreviation": "N.C.",
    "id": 9292,
    "name": "Supreme Court of North Carolina"
  },
  "jurisdiction": {
    "id": 5,
    "name_long": "North Carolina",
    "name": "N.C."
  },
  "cites_to": [],
  "analysis": {
    "cardinality": 97,
    "char_count": 1192,
    "ocr_confidence": 0.463,
    "pagerank": {
      "raw": 2.325495448623218e-07,
      "percentile": 0.790484310089121
    },
    "sha256": "727ce0fe22de4effdde311962351fd12f66ad5716ef0f7e28e72c1af47b37ace",
    "simhash": "1:b9e18d64bbafb174",
    "word_count": 212
  },
  "last_updated": "2023-07-14T15:31:28.368244+00:00",
  "provenance": {
    "date_added": "2019-08-29",
    "source": "Harvard",
    "batch": "2018"
  },
  "casebody": {
    "judges": [],
    "parties": [
      "THE STATE vs. JAMES RAY, SEN., & AL."
    ],
    "opinions": [
      {
        "text": "Nash, J.\nThis Court is a Court of errors to rectify errors in law, and it is a settled rule to affirm every judgment appealed from, which is not erroneous. The statement of the case by the presiding Judge is, in our practice, a substitute lor a bill of exceptions, which sets forth the errors complained of. If no such statement accompanies the case, it is our duty to pronounce such judgment upon the record, as the Court below ought to have done. No such statement accompanies this case. We have looked through the record carefully, and perceive no error in it. The judgment below, not being shown to be erroneous, must be considered correct in point of law\u00bb and must be affirmed.\nPer Curiam.\nJudgment affirmed,",
        "type": "majority",
        "author": "Nash, J. Per Curiam."
      }
    ],
    "attorneys": [
      "Attorney General, for the State,",
      "No counsel for the defendants."
    ],
    "corrections": "",
    "head_matter": "THE STATE vs. JAMES RAY, SEN., & AL.\nThe statement of the case by the presiding 3 udge is, in our practice, a substitute for a bill of exceptions, which sets forth the errors cotfiplained of. If no such statement accompanies the appeal, and no error appears on the record, the judgment will be affirmed.\nAppeal from the Superior Court of Law of Ashe County, at the Fall Term 1848, his Honor Judge Moore presiding.\nAttorney General, for the State,\nNo counsel for the defendants."
  },
  "file_name": "0029-01",
  "first_page_order": 29,
  "last_page_order": 30
}