{
  "id": 2568849,
  "name": "HALL v. CITY OF DURHAM",
  "name_abbreviation": "Hall v. City of Durham",
  "decision_date": "1988-03-09",
  "docket_number": "No. 16PA88",
  "first_page": "743",
  "last_page": "743",
  "citations": [
    {
      "type": "official",
      "cite": "321 N.C. 743"
    }
  ],
  "court": {
    "name_abbreviation": "N.C.",
    "id": 9292,
    "name": "Supreme Court of North Carolina"
  },
  "jurisdiction": {
    "id": 5,
    "name_long": "North Carolina",
    "name": "N.C."
  },
  "cites_to": [
    {
      "cite": "88 N.C. App. 53",
      "category": "reporters:state",
      "reporter": "N.C. App.",
      "case_ids": [
        8357767
      ],
      "opinion_index": -1,
      "case_paths": [
        "/nc-app/88/0053-01"
      ]
    }
  ],
  "analysis": {
    "cardinality": 30,
    "char_count": 188,
    "ocr_confidence": 0.867,
    "pagerank": {
      "raw": 4.03580807328026e-08,
      "percentile": 0.08225267187392006
    },
    "sha256": "a2ad60ee853a2d0e2ea2388c5ff4e1a319bab2144dfc4f1333bcd4cc34907373",
    "simhash": "1:889c61f38aac7b6a",
    "word_count": 31
  },
  "last_updated": "2023-07-14T17:04:28.747837+00:00",
  "provenance": {
    "date_added": "2019-08-29",
    "source": "Harvard",
    "batch": "2018"
  },
  "casebody": {
    "judges": [],
    "parties": [
      "HALL v. CITY OF DURHAM"
    ],
    "opinions": [
      {
        "text": "Petition by defendants for discretionary review pursuant to G.S. 7A-31 and plaintiffs\u2019 cross petition allowed 9 March 1988.",
        "type": "majority",
        "author": null
      }
    ],
    "attorneys": [],
    "corrections": "",
    "head_matter": "HALL v. CITY OF DURHAM\nNo. 16PA88.\nCase below: 88 N.C. App. 53."
  },
  "file_name": "0743-03",
  "first_page_order": 771,
  "last_page_order": 771
}
