{
  "id": 2515713,
  "name": "STATE v. SMITH",
  "name_abbreviation": "State v. Smith",
  "decision_date": "1988-05-05",
  "docket_number": "No. 163A88",
  "first_page": "328",
  "last_page": "328",
  "citations": [
    {
      "type": "official",
      "cite": "322 N.C. 328"
    }
  ],
  "court": {
    "name_abbreviation": "N.C.",
    "id": 9292,
    "name": "Supreme Court of North Carolina"
  },
  "jurisdiction": {
    "id": 5,
    "name_long": "North Carolina",
    "name": "N.C."
  },
  "cites_to": [
    {
      "cite": "89 N.C. App. 19",
      "category": "reporters:state",
      "reporter": "N.C. App.",
      "case_ids": [
        8520035
      ],
      "opinion_index": -1,
      "case_paths": [
        "/nc-app/89/0019-01"
      ]
    }
  ],
  "analysis": {
    "cardinality": 53,
    "char_count": 410,
    "ocr_confidence": 0.857,
    "pagerank": {
      "raw": 4.03580807328026e-08,
      "percentile": 0.08167117079026615
    },
    "sha256": "03c8506cb7ea77ccb8095c9c7851f80c6eae2972f0c9e21b64badada268a75c8",
    "simhash": "1:f9b6b6fbd07e1204",
    "word_count": 68
  },
  "last_updated": "2023-07-14T21:30:38.561214+00:00",
  "provenance": {
    "date_added": "2019-08-29",
    "source": "Harvard",
    "batch": "2018"
  },
  "casebody": {
    "judges": [],
    "parties": [
      "STATE v. SMITH"
    ],
    "opinions": [
      {
        "text": "Motion by Attorney General to dismiss appeal for lack of substantial constitutional question allowed 5 May 1988. Petition by defendants for discretionary review pursuant to G.S. 7A-31 denied 5 May 1988. Only those issues which are the basis of the dissenting opinion in the Court of Appeals shall be presented to the Supreme Court in defendants\u2019 briefs.",
        "type": "majority",
        "author": null
      }
    ],
    "attorneys": [],
    "corrections": "",
    "head_matter": "STATE v. SMITH\nNo. 163A88.\nCase below: 89 N.C. App. 19."
  },
  "file_name": "0328-03",
  "first_page_order": 372,
  "last_page_order": 372
}