{
  "id": 2513576,
  "name": "PROCESS COMPONENTS, INC. v. BALTIMORE AIRCOIL CO., INC.",
  "name_abbreviation": "Process Components, Inc. v. Baltimore Aircoil Co.",
  "decision_date": "1988-07-28",
  "docket_number": "No. 244PA88",
  "first_page": "836",
  "last_page": "836",
  "citations": [
    {
      "type": "official",
      "cite": "322 N.C. 836"
    }
  ],
  "court": {
    "name_abbreviation": "N.C.",
    "id": 9292,
    "name": "Supreme Court of North Carolina"
  },
  "jurisdiction": {
    "id": 5,
    "name_long": "North Carolina",
    "name": "N.C."
  },
  "cites_to": [
    {
      "cite": "89 N.C. App. 649",
      "category": "reporters:state",
      "reporter": "N.C. App.",
      "case_ids": [
        8524380
      ],
      "opinion_index": -1,
      "case_paths": [
        "/nc-app/89/0649-01"
      ]
    }
  ],
  "analysis": {
    "cardinality": 29,
    "char_count": 191,
    "ocr_confidence": 0.817,
    "pagerank": {
      "raw": 4.03580807328026e-08,
      "percentile": 0.08164008789701639
    },
    "sha256": "12c4a8581da1c2666fd88695f8cae408b1d39f339768df88708be2df6a69bac4",
    "simhash": "1:adf9b8e68bb06a60",
    "word_count": 30
  },
  "last_updated": "2023-07-14T21:30:38.561214+00:00",
  "provenance": {
    "date_added": "2019-08-29",
    "source": "Harvard",
    "batch": "2018"
  },
  "casebody": {
    "judges": [],
    "parties": [
      "PROCESS COMPONENTS, INC. v. BALTIMORE AIRCOIL CO., INC."
    ],
    "opinions": [
      {
        "text": "Petition by defendant for discretionary review pursuant to G.S. 7A-31 allowed 28 July 1988.",
        "type": "majority",
        "author": null
      }
    ],
    "attorneys": [],
    "corrections": "",
    "head_matter": "PROCESS COMPONENTS, INC. v. BALTIMORE AIRCOIL CO., INC.\nNo. 244PA88.\nCase below: 89 N.C. App. 649."
  },
  "file_name": "0836-04",
  "first_page_order": 880,
  "last_page_order": 880
}