{
  "id": 2561530,
  "name": "STATE v. CANTY",
  "name_abbreviation": "State v. Canty",
  "decision_date": "1988-09-07",
  "docket_number": "No. 356P88",
  "first_page": "176",
  "last_page": "176",
  "citations": [
    {
      "type": "official",
      "cite": "323 N.C. 176"
    }
  ],
  "court": {
    "name_abbreviation": "N.C.",
    "id": 9292,
    "name": "Supreme Court of North Carolina"
  },
  "jurisdiction": {
    "id": 5,
    "name_long": "North Carolina",
    "name": "N.C."
  },
  "cites_to": [
    {
      "cite": "90 N.C. App. 612",
      "category": "reporters:state",
      "reporter": "N.C. App.",
      "opinion_index": -1
    }
  ],
  "analysis": {
    "cardinality": 25,
    "char_count": 152,
    "ocr_confidence": 0.8,
    "sha256": "96d98e67eb3ec072ec5d4bb051d9cd84174c3e112a92a8209b78e4b0cf45d9ab",
    "simhash": "1:a8ba226696217ed1",
    "word_count": 25
  },
  "last_updated": "2023-07-14T15:25:25.148086+00:00",
  "provenance": {
    "date_added": "2019-08-29",
    "source": "Harvard",
    "batch": "2018"
  },
  "casebody": {
    "judges": [],
    "parties": [
      "STATE v. CANTY"
    ],
    "opinions": [
      {
        "text": "Petition by defendant for discretionary review pursuant to G.S. 7A-31 denied 7 September 1988.",
        "type": "majority",
        "author": null
      }
    ],
    "attorneys": [],
    "corrections": "",
    "head_matter": "STATE v. CANTY\nNo. 356P88.\nCase below: 90 N.C. App. 612."
  },
  "file_name": "0176-04",
  "first_page_order": 208,
  "last_page_order": 208
}