{
  "id": 2561907,
  "name": "MOORE v. HENLINE",
  "name_abbreviation": "Moore v. Henline",
  "decision_date": "1989-01-04",
  "docket_number": "No. 483P88",
  "first_page": "704",
  "last_page": "704",
  "citations": [
    {
      "type": "official",
      "cite": "323 N.C. 704"
    }
  ],
  "court": {
    "name_abbreviation": "N.C.",
    "id": 9292,
    "name": "Supreme Court of North Carolina"
  },
  "jurisdiction": {
    "id": 5,
    "name_long": "North Carolina",
    "name": "N.C."
  },
  "cites_to": [
    {
      "cite": "91 N.C. App. 585",
      "category": "reporters:state",
      "reporter": "N.C. App.",
      "opinion_index": -1
    }
  ],
  "analysis": {
    "cardinality": 37,
    "char_count": 278,
    "ocr_confidence": 0.768,
    "sha256": "9f2cc6fe9b2aa88ebb7291834bc26805403a9f2f9f03c32f0f960700b955d1da",
    "simhash": "1:5fcc0d79d6e27808",
    "word_count": 44
  },
  "last_updated": "2023-07-14T15:25:25.148086+00:00",
  "provenance": {
    "date_added": "2019-08-29",
    "source": "Harvard",
    "batch": "2018"
  },
  "casebody": {
    "judges": [],
    "parties": [
      "MOORE v. HENLINE"
    ],
    "opinions": [
      {
        "text": "Petition by defendant (R. C. Henline) for discretionary review pursuant to G.S. 7A-31 denied 4 January 1989. Motion by plaintiff to dismiss appeal for lack of substantial constitutional question allowed 4 January 1989.",
        "type": "majority",
        "author": null
      }
    ],
    "attorneys": [],
    "corrections": "",
    "head_matter": "MOORE v. HENLINE\nNo. 483P88.\nCase below: 91 N.C. App. 585."
  },
  "file_name": "0704-05",
  "first_page_order": 736,
  "last_page_order": 736
}