{
  "id": 2484973,
  "name": "STATE v. BEAM",
  "name_abbreviation": "State v. Beam",
  "decision_date": "1989-02-09",
  "docket_number": "No. 524PA88",
  "first_page": "114",
  "last_page": "114",
  "citations": [
    {
      "type": "official",
      "cite": "324 N.C. 114"
    }
  ],
  "court": {
    "name_abbreviation": "N.C.",
    "id": 9292,
    "name": "Supreme Court of North Carolina"
  },
  "jurisdiction": {
    "id": 5,
    "name_long": "North Carolina",
    "name": "N.C."
  },
  "cites_to": [
    {
      "cite": "91 N.C. App. 629",
      "category": "reporters:state",
      "reporter": "N.C. App.",
      "case_ids": [
        8526377
      ],
      "opinion_index": -1,
      "case_paths": [
        "/nc-app/91/0629-01"
      ]
    }
  ],
  "analysis": {
    "cardinality": 26,
    "char_count": 159,
    "ocr_confidence": 0.853,
    "pagerank": {
      "raw": 4.03580807328026e-08,
      "percentile": 0.0813084083280531
    },
    "sha256": "8d22cedeac6185674a394486edcae4f75a62e54db15f3c4e015d42af192bbfec",
    "simhash": "1:4db22c659bd4651f",
    "word_count": 26
  },
  "last_updated": "2023-07-14T20:39:53.264050+00:00",
  "provenance": {
    "date_added": "2019-08-29",
    "source": "Harvard",
    "batch": "2018"
  },
  "casebody": {
    "judges": [],
    "parties": [
      "STATE v. BEAM"
    ],
    "opinions": [
      {
        "text": "Petition by Attorney General for discretionary review pursuant to G.S. 7A-31 allowed 9 February 1989.",
        "type": "majority",
        "author": null
      }
    ],
    "attorneys": [],
    "corrections": "",
    "head_matter": "STATE v. BEAM\nNo. 524PA88.\nCase below: 91 N.C. App. 629."
  },
  "file_name": "0114-01",
  "first_page_order": 152,
  "last_page_order": 152
}