{
  "id": 2492805,
  "name": "STATE v. ENSLEY",
  "name_abbreviation": "State v. Ensley",
  "decision_date": "1989-09-06",
  "docket_number": "No. 273P89",
  "first_page": "274",
  "last_page": "274",
  "citations": [
    {
      "type": "official",
      "cite": "325 N.C. 274"
    }
  ],
  "court": {
    "name_abbreviation": "N.C.",
    "id": 9292,
    "name": "Supreme Court of North Carolina"
  },
  "jurisdiction": {
    "id": 5,
    "name_long": "North Carolina",
    "name": "N.C."
  },
  "cites_to": [
    {
      "cite": "94 N.C. App. 390",
      "category": "reporters:state",
      "reporter": "N.C. App.",
      "opinion_index": -1
    }
  ],
  "analysis": {
    "cardinality": 25,
    "char_count": 152,
    "ocr_confidence": 0.756,
    "sha256": "a3351018628d796164ace10aa9ddc2a7c56eeb1f639e7668a9b44d8cd94f30c8",
    "simhash": "1:45ce24f7c9693b38",
    "word_count": 25
  },
  "last_updated": "2023-07-14T16:51:09.974518+00:00",
  "provenance": {
    "date_added": "2019-08-29",
    "source": "Harvard",
    "batch": "2018"
  },
  "casebody": {
    "judges": [],
    "parties": [
      "STATE v. ENSLEY"
    ],
    "opinions": [
      {
        "text": "Petition by defendants for discretionary review pursuant to G.S. 7A-31 denied 6 September 1989.",
        "type": "majority",
        "author": null
      }
    ],
    "attorneys": [],
    "corrections": "",
    "head_matter": "STATE v. ENSLEY\nNo. 273P89\nCase below: 94 N.C. App. 390"
  },
  "file_name": "0274-02",
  "first_page_order": 300,
  "last_page_order": 300
}