{
  "id": 2492818,
  "name": "STANCIL v. STANCIL",
  "name_abbreviation": "Stancil v. Stancil",
  "decision_date": "1989-10-05",
  "docket_number": "No. 299PA89",
  "first_page": "433",
  "last_page": "433",
  "citations": [
    {
      "type": "official",
      "cite": "325 N.C. 433"
    }
  ],
  "court": {
    "name_abbreviation": "N.C.",
    "id": 9292,
    "name": "Supreme Court of North Carolina"
  },
  "jurisdiction": {
    "id": 5,
    "name_long": "North Carolina",
    "name": "N.C."
  },
  "cites_to": [
    {
      "cite": "94 N.C.App. 319",
      "category": "reporters:state",
      "reporter": "N.C. App.",
      "case_ids": [
        8527113
      ],
      "opinion_index": -1,
      "case_paths": [
        "/nc-app/94/0319-01"
      ]
    }
  ],
  "analysis": {
    "cardinality": 23,
    "char_count": 153,
    "ocr_confidence": 0.737,
    "pagerank": {
      "raw": 4.03580807328026e-08,
      "percentile": 0.0814033945608412
    },
    "sha256": "19427cb7888b9d662dd4ee6ca339eb7265535829efe90133d86093be8432be1f",
    "simhash": "1:6df81af3ec500269",
    "word_count": 24
  },
  "last_updated": "2023-07-14T16:51:09.974518+00:00",
  "provenance": {
    "date_added": "2019-08-29",
    "source": "Harvard",
    "batch": "2018"
  },
  "casebody": {
    "judges": [],
    "parties": [
      "STANCIL v. STANCIL"
    ],
    "opinions": [
      {
        "text": "Petition by defendant for discretionary review pursuant to G.S. 7A-31 allowed 5 October 1989.",
        "type": "majority",
        "author": null
      }
    ],
    "attorneys": [],
    "corrections": "",
    "head_matter": "STANCIL v. STANCIL\nNo. 299PA89\nCase below: 94 N.C.App. 319"
  },
  "file_name": "0433-03",
  "first_page_order": 459,
  "last_page_order": 459
}