{
  "id": 2487947,
  "name": "STATE v. SCHUITMAKER",
  "name_abbreviation": "State v. Schuitmaker",
  "decision_date": "1989-10-05",
  "docket_number": "No. 352P89",
  "first_page": "436",
  "last_page": "436",
  "citations": [
    {
      "type": "official",
      "cite": "325 N.C. 436"
    }
  ],
  "court": {
    "name_abbreviation": "N.C.",
    "id": 9292,
    "name": "Supreme Court of North Carolina"
  },
  "jurisdiction": {
    "id": 5,
    "name_long": "North Carolina",
    "name": "N.C."
  },
  "cites_to": [
    {
      "cite": "95 N.C.App. 225",
      "category": "reporters:state",
      "reporter": "N.C. App.",
      "opinion_index": -1
    }
  ],
  "analysis": {
    "cardinality": 35,
    "char_count": 270,
    "ocr_confidence": 0.811,
    "sha256": "7cd63ecdfb7aa44710fbbdba4d9fa2226929150d160237c9eb15e306353d341b",
    "simhash": "1:8fb81b73debcb419",
    "word_count": 41
  },
  "last_updated": "2023-07-14T16:51:09.974518+00:00",
  "provenance": {
    "date_added": "2019-08-29",
    "source": "Harvard",
    "batch": "2018"
  },
  "casebody": {
    "judges": [],
    "parties": [
      "STATE v. SCHUITMAKER"
    ],
    "opinions": [
      {
        "text": "Motion by Attorney General to dismiss appeal for lack of substantial constitutional question allowed 5 October 1989. Petition by defendant for discretionary review pursuant to G.S. 7A-31 denied 5 October 1989.",
        "type": "majority",
        "author": null
      }
    ],
    "attorneys": [],
    "corrections": "",
    "head_matter": "STATE v. SCHUITMAKER\nNo. 352P89\nCase below: 95 N.C.App. 225"
  },
  "file_name": "0436-02",
  "first_page_order": 462,
  "last_page_order": 462
}