{
  "id": 2491281,
  "name": "STATE OF NORTH CAROLINA v. MADELINE TAYLOR",
  "name_abbreviation": "State v. Taylor",
  "decision_date": "1989-11-09",
  "docket_number": "No. 92A89",
  "first_page": "542",
  "last_page": "542",
  "citations": [
    {
      "type": "official",
      "cite": "325 N.C. 542"
    }
  ],
  "court": {
    "name_abbreviation": "N.C.",
    "id": 9292,
    "name": "Supreme Court of North Carolina"
  },
  "jurisdiction": {
    "id": 5,
    "name_long": "North Carolina",
    "name": "N.C."
  },
  "cites_to": [
    {
      "cite": "375 S.E.2d 174",
      "category": "reporters:state_regional",
      "reporter": "S.E.2d",
      "year": 1989,
      "opinion_index": -1
    },
    {
      "cite": "92 N.C. App. 577",
      "category": "reporters:state",
      "reporter": "N.C. App.",
      "case_ids": [
        8527393
      ],
      "year": 1989,
      "opinion_index": -1,
      "case_paths": [
        "/nc-app/92/0577-01"
      ]
    }
  ],
  "analysis": {
    "cardinality": 105,
    "char_count": 1001,
    "ocr_confidence": 0.733,
    "pagerank": {
      "raw": 4.03580807328026e-08,
      "percentile": 0.0813804202484392
    },
    "sha256": "7f83d978ce97b67c8cea90de300bdcf63771cd9ccc84156b3ab12d150bf62c30",
    "simhash": "1:2c19b68b644388f9",
    "word_count": 165
  },
  "last_updated": "2023-07-14T16:51:09.974518+00:00",
  "provenance": {
    "date_added": "2019-08-29",
    "source": "Harvard",
    "batch": "2018"
  },
  "casebody": {
    "judges": [],
    "parties": [
      "STATE OF NORTH CAROLINA v. MADELINE TAYLOR"
    ],
    "opinions": [
      {
        "text": "PER CURIAM.\nFor the reasons stated in the dissenting opinion of Cozort, J., the decision of the Court of Appeals is reversed. The cause is remanded to the Court of Appeals for further remand to the Superior Court, Pitt County, for reinstatement of the judgment.\nReversed and remanded.\n. See also 1989 N.C. Sess. Laws ch. 144 (clarifies N.C.G.S. \u00a7 14-118.2 by adding language which expressly covers the fact situation presented).",
        "type": "majority",
        "author": "PER CURIAM."
      }
    ],
    "attorneys": [
      "Lacy H. Thornburg, Attorney General, by David M. Parker, Assistant Attorney General, for the State, appellant.",
      "Leland Q. Towns and Milton F. Fitch, Jr., for defendant-appellee."
    ],
    "corrections": "",
    "head_matter": "STATE OF NORTH CAROLINA v. MADELINE TAYLOR\nNo. 92A89\n(Filed 9 November 1989)\nAPPEAL of right by the State pursuant to N.C.G.S. \u00a7 7A-30(2) from a decision of a divided panel of the Court of Appeals, 92 N.C. App. 577, 375 S.E.2d 174 (1989), vacating a judgment of imprisonment entered upon defendant\u2019s conviction for a violation of N.C.G.S. \u00a7 14-118.2. Heard in the Supreme Court 11 October 1989.\nLacy H. Thornburg, Attorney General, by David M. Parker, Assistant Attorney General, for the State, appellant.\nLeland Q. Towns and Milton F. Fitch, Jr., for defendant-appellee."
  },
  "file_name": "0542-01",
  "first_page_order": 568,
  "last_page_order": 568
}