{
  "id": 2492262,
  "name": "IN RE APPLICATION OF RAYNOR",
  "name_abbreviation": "In re Raynor",
  "decision_date": "1989-11-09",
  "docket_number": "No. 356P89",
  "first_page": "546",
  "last_page": "546",
  "citations": [
    {
      "type": "official",
      "cite": "325 N.C. 546"
    }
  ],
  "court": {
    "name_abbreviation": "N.C.",
    "id": 9292,
    "name": "Supreme Court of North Carolina"
  },
  "jurisdiction": {
    "id": 5,
    "name_long": "North Carolina",
    "name": "N.C."
  },
  "cites_to": [
    {
      "cite": "94 N.C.App. 173",
      "category": "reporters:state",
      "reporter": "N.C. App.",
      "case_ids": [
        8526786
      ],
      "opinion_index": -1,
      "case_paths": [
        "/nc-app/94/0173-01"
      ]
    }
  ],
  "analysis": {
    "cardinality": 36,
    "char_count": 310,
    "ocr_confidence": 0.758,
    "pagerank": {
      "raw": 4.03580807328026e-08,
      "percentile": 0.08139586516433969
    },
    "sha256": "db1cd1bb281d8cd1686c06cc9c80df29ae2cf140d4e2c5c5493a2401d85925d4",
    "simhash": "1:a89286f7fb2b663a",
    "word_count": 47
  },
  "last_updated": "2023-07-14T16:51:09.974518+00:00",
  "provenance": {
    "date_added": "2019-08-29",
    "source": "Harvard",
    "batch": "2018"
  },
  "casebody": {
    "judges": [],
    "parties": [
      "IN RE APPLICATION OF RAYNOR"
    ],
    "opinions": [
      {
        "text": "Motion by defendant Raynor to dismiss appeal by several plaintiffs for lack of substantial constitutional question allowed 9 November 1989. Petition by several plaintiffs for discretionary review pursuant to G.S. 7A-31 denied 9 November 1989.",
        "type": "majority",
        "author": null
      }
    ],
    "attorneys": [],
    "corrections": "",
    "head_matter": "IN RE APPLICATION OF RAYNOR\nNo. 356P89\nCase below: 94 N.C.App. 173"
  },
  "file_name": "0546-02",
  "first_page_order": 572,
  "last_page_order": 572
}