{
  "id": 5309212,
  "name": "JOSEPH BLAIR SLAUGHTER v. WILLIAM M. SLAUGHTER and LEROY S. VEASEY",
  "name_abbreviation": "Slaughter v. Slaughter",
  "decision_date": "1990-04-05",
  "docket_number": "No. 252PA89",
  "first_page": "479",
  "last_page": "479",
  "citations": [
    {
      "type": "official",
      "cite": "326 N.C. 479"
    }
  ],
  "court": {
    "name_abbreviation": "N.C.",
    "id": 9292,
    "name": "Supreme Court of North Carolina"
  },
  "jurisdiction": {
    "id": 5,
    "name_long": "North Carolina",
    "name": "N.C."
  },
  "cites_to": [
    {
      "cite": "379 S.E.2d 98",
      "category": "reporters:state_regional",
      "reporter": "S.E.2d",
      "year": 1989,
      "opinion_index": -1
    },
    {
      "cite": "93 N.C. App. 717",
      "category": "reporters:state",
      "reporter": "N.C. App.",
      "case_ids": [
        8528625
      ],
      "year": 1989,
      "opinion_index": -1,
      "case_paths": [
        "/nc-app/93/0717-01"
      ]
    }
  ],
  "analysis": {
    "cardinality": 106,
    "char_count": 985,
    "ocr_confidence": 0.748,
    "pagerank": {
      "raw": 8.945880495976006e-08,
      "percentile": 0.5012566369699546
    },
    "sha256": "0cf9dd1b6894ec42f36a020f25226260bbc30ea6889f8977886d01650697b01a",
    "simhash": "1:027100c00233ac4d",
    "word_count": 154
  },
  "last_updated": "2023-07-14T18:38:26.587833+00:00",
  "provenance": {
    "date_added": "2019-08-29",
    "source": "Harvard",
    "batch": "2018"
  },
  "casebody": {
    "judges": [],
    "parties": [
      "JOSEPH BLAIR SLAUGHTER v. WILLIAM M. SLAUGHTER and LEROY S. VEASEY"
    ],
    "opinions": [
      {
        "text": "PER CURIAM.\nAfter hearing arguments and carefully considering the new briefs and record, we conclude that we improvidently allowed defendant\u2019s petition for discretionary review. The result is, therefore:\nDiscretionary review improvidently allowed.",
        "type": "majority",
        "author": "PER CURIAM."
      }
    ],
    "attorneys": [
      "Burns, Day & Presnell, P.A., by Lacy M. Presnell III, Daniel C. Higgins, and Susan F. Vick, for plaintiff appellee.",
      "Broughton, Wilkins & Webb, P.A., by Charles P. Wilkins and Kenneth B. Oettinger, for defendant appellant Veasey."
    ],
    "corrections": "",
    "head_matter": "JOSEPH BLAIR SLAUGHTER v. WILLIAM M. SLAUGHTER and LEROY S. VEASEY\nNo. 252PA89\n(Filed 5 April 1990)\nOn defendant Veasey\u2019s petition for discretionary review pursuant to N.C.G.S. \u00a7 7A-31 of the decision of the Court of Appeals, 93 N.C. App. 717, 379 S.E.2d 98 (1989), reversing a judgment notwithstanding the verdict by Stephens, J., at the 7 March 1988 Session of WAKE Superior Court and remanding the case for entry of judgment on the verdict in favor of plaintiff. Heard in the Supreme Court 14 March 1990.\nBurns, Day & Presnell, P.A., by Lacy M. Presnell III, Daniel C. Higgins, and Susan F. Vick, for plaintiff appellee.\nBroughton, Wilkins & Webb, P.A., by Charles P. Wilkins and Kenneth B. Oettinger, for defendant appellant Veasey."
  },
  "file_name": "0479-01",
  "first_page_order": 515,
  "last_page_order": 515
}