{
  "id": 5305574,
  "name": "INMAN v. LEISURE",
  "name_abbreviation": "Inman v. Leisure",
  "decision_date": "1990-05-10",
  "docket_number": "No. 101P90",
  "first_page": "596",
  "last_page": "596",
  "citations": [
    {
      "type": "official",
      "cite": "326 N.C. 596"
    }
  ],
  "court": {
    "name_abbreviation": "N.C.",
    "id": 9292,
    "name": "Supreme Court of North Carolina"
  },
  "jurisdiction": {
    "id": 5,
    "name_long": "North Carolina",
    "name": "N.C."
  },
  "cites_to": [
    {
      "cite": "97 N.C.App. 332",
      "category": "reporters:state",
      "reporter": "N.C. App.",
      "opinion_index": -1
    }
  ],
  "analysis": {
    "cardinality": 28,
    "char_count": 173,
    "ocr_confidence": 0.771,
    "sha256": "4c7933fc1146aba78f8a9e0a198d4f0ebaea73227b6faf5c2fbc085b4758defe",
    "simhash": "1:0dbc1c6ba132304a",
    "word_count": 28
  },
  "last_updated": "2023-07-14T18:38:26.587833+00:00",
  "provenance": {
    "date_added": "2019-08-29",
    "source": "Harvard",
    "batch": "2018"
  },
  "casebody": {
    "judges": [],
    "parties": [
      "INMAN v. LEISURE"
    ],
    "opinions": [
      {
        "text": "Petition by defendant (North American Van Lines) for discretionary review pursuant to G.S. 7A-31 denied 10 May 1990.",
        "type": "majority",
        "author": null
      }
    ],
    "attorneys": [],
    "corrections": "",
    "head_matter": "INMAN v. LEISURE\nNo. 101P90\nCase below: 97 N.C.App. 332"
  },
  "file_name": "0596-03",
  "first_page_order": 632,
  "last_page_order": 632
}