{
  "id": 5308643,
  "name": "HATCHER v. ROSE",
  "name_abbreviation": "Hatcher v. Rose",
  "decision_date": "1990-06-13",
  "docket_number": "No. 171PA90",
  "first_page": "800",
  "last_page": "800",
  "citations": [
    {
      "type": "official",
      "cite": "326 N.C. 800"
    }
  ],
  "court": {
    "name_abbreviation": "N.C.",
    "id": 9292,
    "name": "Supreme Court of North Carolina"
  },
  "jurisdiction": {
    "id": 5,
    "name_long": "North Carolina",
    "name": "N.C."
  },
  "cites_to": [
    {
      "cite": "97 N.C.App. 652",
      "category": "reporters:state",
      "reporter": "N.C. App.",
      "case_ids": [
        8522797
      ],
      "opinion_index": -1,
      "case_paths": [
        "/nc-app/97/0652-01"
      ]
    }
  ],
  "analysis": {
    "cardinality": 24,
    "char_count": 149,
    "ocr_confidence": 0.629,
    "pagerank": {
      "raw": 4.03580807328026e-08,
      "percentile": 0.15764741496511958
    },
    "sha256": "39ea8bd72fc24445f5eb080522f566f687bdb2bf5a52caf42635f146e4639f40",
    "simhash": "1:cdfa34c0c27d326b",
    "word_count": 24
  },
  "last_updated": "2023-07-14T18:38:26.587833+00:00",
  "provenance": {
    "date_added": "2019-08-29",
    "source": "Harvard",
    "batch": "2018"
  },
  "casebody": {
    "judges": [],
    "parties": [
      "HATCHER v. ROSE"
    ],
    "opinions": [
      {
        "text": "Petition by defendants for discretionary review pursuant to G.S. 7A-31 allowed 13 June 1990.",
        "type": "majority",
        "author": null
      }
    ],
    "attorneys": [],
    "corrections": "",
    "head_matter": "HATCHER v. ROSE\nNo. 171PA90\nCase below: 97 N.C.App. 652"
  },
  "file_name": "0800-01",
  "first_page_order": 836,
  "last_page_order": 836
}