{
  "id": 2496558,
  "name": "STATE v. RICHARDSON",
  "name_abbreviation": "State v. Richardson",
  "decision_date": "1990-12-05",
  "docket_number": "No. 514P90",
  "first_page": "641",
  "last_page": "641",
  "citations": [
    {
      "type": "official",
      "cite": "327 N.C. 641"
    }
  ],
  "court": {
    "name_abbreviation": "N.C.",
    "id": 9292,
    "name": "Supreme Court of North Carolina"
  },
  "jurisdiction": {
    "id": 5,
    "name_long": "North Carolina",
    "name": "N.C."
  },
  "cites_to": [
    {
      "cite": "100 N.C.App. 240",
      "category": "reporters:state",
      "reporter": "N.C. App.",
      "case_ids": [
        8526601
      ],
      "opinion_index": -1,
      "case_paths": [
        "/nc-app/100/0240-01"
      ]
    }
  ],
  "analysis": {
    "cardinality": 36,
    "char_count": 276,
    "ocr_confidence": 0.792,
    "pagerank": {
      "raw": 4.03580807328026e-08,
      "percentile": 0.08145648645924917
    },
    "sha256": "375d0a8442ba2bde97b2717b9e8067124f8d029443e8439e3f32e1880726e04c",
    "simhash": "1:0a740a63dd22e429",
    "word_count": 42
  },
  "last_updated": "2023-07-14T20:39:47.348264+00:00",
  "provenance": {
    "date_added": "2019-08-29",
    "source": "Harvard",
    "batch": "2018"
  },
  "casebody": {
    "judges": [],
    "parties": [
      "STATE v. RICHARDSON"
    ],
    "opinions": [
      {
        "text": "Motion by the Attorney General to dismiss appeal for lack of substantial constitutional question allowed 5 December 1990. Petition by defendant for discretionary review pursuant to G.S. 7A-31 denied 5 December 1990.",
        "type": "majority",
        "author": null
      }
    ],
    "attorneys": [],
    "corrections": "",
    "head_matter": "STATE v. RICHARDSON\nNo. 514P90\nCase below: 100 N.C.App. 240"
  },
  "file_name": "0641-01",
  "first_page_order": 679,
  "last_page_order": 679
}