{
  "id": 2538512,
  "name": "STATE v. DAIL",
  "name_abbreviation": "State v. Dail",
  "decision_date": "1991-01-10",
  "docket_number": "No. 415P90",
  "first_page": "94",
  "last_page": "94",
  "citations": [
    {
      "type": "official",
      "cite": "328 N.C. 94"
    }
  ],
  "court": {
    "name_abbreviation": "N.C.",
    "id": 9292,
    "name": "Supreme Court of North Carolina"
  },
  "jurisdiction": {
    "id": 5,
    "name_long": "North Carolina",
    "name": "N.C."
  },
  "cites_to": [
    {
      "cite": "99 N.C.App. 584",
      "category": "reporters:state",
      "reporter": "N.C. App.",
      "opinion_index": -1
    }
  ],
  "analysis": {
    "cardinality": 36,
    "char_count": 269,
    "ocr_confidence": 0.793,
    "sha256": "6954b56dc0628313b468b2d038f46a519d7b020fe4d8bd6a04be19eb34c6259e",
    "simhash": "1:4f9c144b9a66f803",
    "word_count": 42
  },
  "last_updated": "2023-07-14T22:58:40.693084+00:00",
  "provenance": {
    "date_added": "2019-08-29",
    "source": "Harvard",
    "batch": "2018"
  },
  "casebody": {
    "judges": [],
    "parties": [
      "STATE v. DAIL"
    ],
    "opinions": [
      {
        "text": "Motion by the Attorney General to dismiss appeal for lack of substantial constitutional question allowed 10 January 1991. Petition by defendant for discretionary review pursuant to G.S. 7A-31 denied 10 January 1991.",
        "type": "majority",
        "author": null
      }
    ],
    "attorneys": [],
    "corrections": "",
    "head_matter": "STATE v. DAIL\nNo. 415P90\nCase below: 99 N.C.App. 584"
  },
  "file_name": "0094-02",
  "first_page_order": 128,
  "last_page_order": 128
}