{
  "id": 2543137,
  "name": "STATE v. LOVE",
  "name_abbreviation": "State v. Love",
  "decision_date": "1991-01-10",
  "docket_number": "No. 512P90",
  "first_page": "95",
  "last_page": "95",
  "citations": [
    {
      "type": "official",
      "cite": "328 N.C. 95"
    }
  ],
  "court": {
    "name_abbreviation": "N.C.",
    "id": 9292,
    "name": "Supreme Court of North Carolina"
  },
  "jurisdiction": {
    "id": 5,
    "name_long": "North Carolina",
    "name": "N.C."
  },
  "cites_to": [
    {
      "cite": "100 N.C.App. 226",
      "category": "reporters:state",
      "reporter": "N.C. App.",
      "case_ids": [
        8526582
      ],
      "opinion_index": -1,
      "case_paths": [
        "/nc-app/100/0226-01"
      ]
    }
  ],
  "analysis": {
    "cardinality": 36,
    "char_count": 270,
    "ocr_confidence": 0.717,
    "pagerank": {
      "raw": 4.03580807328026e-08,
      "percentile": 0.08198335115290506
    },
    "sha256": "25d73edb167e84dd9e1f2bd8993033f4d21b99795749ffadd2d32d2490429115",
    "simhash": "1:cf98046b5862f861",
    "word_count": 42
  },
  "last_updated": "2023-07-14T22:58:40.693084+00:00",
  "provenance": {
    "date_added": "2019-08-29",
    "source": "Harvard",
    "batch": "2018"
  },
  "casebody": {
    "judges": [],
    "parties": [
      "STATE v. LOVE"
    ],
    "opinions": [
      {
        "text": "Motion by the Attorney General to dismiss appeal for lack of substantial constitutional question allowed 10 January 1991. Petition by defendant for discretionary review pursuant to G.S. 7A-31 denied 10 January 1991.",
        "type": "majority",
        "author": null
      }
    ],
    "attorneys": [],
    "corrections": "",
    "head_matter": "STATE v. LOVE\nNo. 512P90\nCase below: 100 N.C.App. 226"
  },
  "file_name": "0095-02",
  "first_page_order": 129,
  "last_page_order": 129
}