{
  "id": 2545653,
  "name": "CLAUDE E. NASH and JANIS WESSOLLECK v. MOTOROLA COMMUNICATIONS AND ELECTRONICS, INC., CHARLES ROBINSON, MOTOROLA, INC. and AIRCALL, INC.",
  "name_abbreviation": "Nash v. Motorola Communications & Electronics, Inc.",
  "decision_date": "1991-02-07",
  "docket_number": "No. 568PA89",
  "first_page": "267",
  "last_page": "267",
  "citations": [
    {
      "type": "official",
      "cite": "328 N.C. 267"
    }
  ],
  "court": {
    "name_abbreviation": "N.C.",
    "id": 9292,
    "name": "Supreme Court of North Carolina"
  },
  "jurisdiction": {
    "id": 5,
    "name_long": "North Carolina",
    "name": "N.C."
  },
  "cites_to": [
    {
      "cite": "385 S.E.2d 537",
      "category": "reporters:state_regional",
      "reporter": "S.E.2d",
      "year": 1989,
      "opinion_index": -1
    },
    {
      "cite": "96 N.C. App. 329",
      "category": "reporters:state",
      "reporter": "N.C. App.",
      "case_ids": [
        8521962
      ],
      "year": 1989,
      "opinion_index": -1,
      "case_paths": [
        "/nc-app/96/0329-01"
      ]
    }
  ],
  "analysis": {
    "cardinality": 84,
    "char_count": 694,
    "ocr_confidence": 0.733,
    "pagerank": {
      "raw": 1.3070386952588202e-07,
      "percentile": 0.623590603158717
    },
    "sha256": "1c12ba0edb49377a6546c31ad77b938cc26464ec1adb7d45339bedb11110f172",
    "simhash": "1:873a351d6ad7366d",
    "word_count": 110
  },
  "last_updated": "2023-07-14T22:58:40.693084+00:00",
  "provenance": {
    "date_added": "2019-08-29",
    "source": "Harvard",
    "batch": "2018"
  },
  "casebody": {
    "judges": [
      "Justice Martin did not participate in this decision."
    ],
    "parties": [
      "CLAUDE E. NASH and JANIS WESSOLLECK v. MOTOROLA COMMUNICATIONS AND ELECTRONICS, INC., CHARLES ROBINSON, MOTOROLA, INC. and AIRCALL, INC."
    ],
    "opinions": [
      {
        "text": "PER CURIAM.\nAffirmed.\nJustice Martin did not participate in this decision.",
        "type": "majority",
        "author": "PER CURIAM."
      }
    ],
    "attorneys": [
      "Patrick U. Smathers, P.A., by Patrick U. Smathers, for plaintiffs appellees.",
      "Van Winkle, Buck, Wall, Starnes and Davis, P.A., by Roy W. Davis, Jr. and Michelle Rippon, for defendants appellants."
    ],
    "corrections": "",
    "head_matter": "CLAUDE E. NASH and JANIS WESSOLLECK v. MOTOROLA COMMUNICATIONS AND ELECTRONICS, INC., CHARLES ROBINSON, MOTOROLA, INC. and AIRCALL, INC.\nNo. 568PA89\n(Filed 7 February 1991)\nOn discretionary review of the decision of the Court of Appeals, 96 N.C. App. 329, 385 S.E.2d 537 (1989), reversing a judgment entered by Owens, J., in the Superior Court, HENDERSON County on 29 June 1988. Heard in the Supreme Court 6 September 1990.\nPatrick U. Smathers, P.A., by Patrick U. Smathers, for plaintiffs appellees.\nVan Winkle, Buck, Wall, Starnes and Davis, P.A., by Roy W. Davis, Jr. and Michelle Rippon, for defendants appellants."
  },
  "file_name": "0267-01",
  "first_page_order": 301,
  "last_page_order": 301
}